Excerpts

Pelicans showed a trend (r 2 = 0.41, P<0.0001) toward earlier arrival between 1965 and 2008, with arrival dates advancing approximately 16 days ( Fig. 2 ; 21 April in 1965 vs. 5 April in 2008).

These values were greater than zero for both ACT (Mean = 77.18 μV; t (17) = 6.88, p<10 −7 ) and PASS (Mean = 32.04 μV; t (17) = 3.25, p<0.002), and the difference between ACT and PASS was highly significant (t (17) = 5.5, p<10 −4 ).

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed a highly significant correlation between group classification and cockroach length ( P < 0.0001), confirming the procedure performed to classify cockroaches into groups.

This difference is highly significant with a p -value < 0.0001.

The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

A retrospective analysis using this model enabled highly significant differentiation between peptide and non-peptide receptor families (logistic regression; p value < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis using a paired Student's t‐test revealed a highly significant enhancement in fluorescence intensity after shrinkage (p < 0.0001; Figure 6C ).

Of these pathways, Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (along with other neurodegenerative conditions), oxidative phosphorylation, metabolic pathways, and retrograde endocannabinoid signaling emerged as highly significant pathways ( p < 0.0001; Figure 5(a) and Table S2).

We found highly significant correlation between USP18 and PTEN expression levels in Mem for all tested subjects ( P < 0.0001, r = 0.9511; n = 30) ( Fig 2B ).

Between groups analysis (PCOS, T2D and controls) showed a highly significant difference between the groups ( F = 63.43, p < 0.0001).

The fitted model was extremely significant ( F = 61.47 and p < 0.0001).

Fisher's exact test indicated highly significant differences across all groups ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the potential of epitope 5 as a reliable diagnostic marker.

Correlations among root weight, root length, root volume, and root surface area were all highly significant ( P < 0.0001, r ≥ 0.9, n = 134).

Pearson correlations between both foliar N and foliar P sampled in 1992 and 2024 were both highly significant (foliar N: r = 0.42, df = 78, p = 0.0001; foliar P: r = 0.57, df = 78, p < 0.0001).

The “Model F -value” was highly significant, with only a 0.01% likelihood of being influenced by noise ( P < 0.0001) (Table S2 ).

The obtained mathematical model of TI was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

Differences between mean values were analyzed and considered significant when P < 0.05 or considered extremely significant when P < 0.0001 concerning the control values.

Acetic acid exhibited a highly significant distinction (P < 0.0001) in comparison to hydrochloric acid and 4 % NaOH, respectively.

pylori infection score was higher in FD than NERD and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

lar region, maximum temperature in the ocular region, standard deviation of temperature in the digital flexor tendons of the hind limb, standard deviation of temperature in the tarsus region, maximum temperature in the thorax, and average temperature in the coronary region of the thoracic limb made highly significant contributions ( p < 0.0001) to the discriminant functions when qualitative gait evaluation levels were the clustering criteria.

Turkish studies consistently confirmed the association of ARMS2 A69S variant with AMD risk, with odds ratios ranging from 3.0 to 8.56 (95% CI: 1.23–20.83) and p values ≤ 0.008, including highly significant results (p < 0.0001).

The analysis revealed a highly significant difference in symptom severity distribution (χ2 = 18.13, p = 0.0001, and degrees of freedom = 2).

A Fisher's exact test confirms a highly significant difference in the distribution of WAI categories between the two groups ( p < 0.0001). 3.4 Endometriosis in the workplace: employee experiences of support and awareness To assess workplace experiences, women with endometriosis were surveyed about their ability to communicate about their condition, perceived employer support, and desired accommodations.

The relationship between observed DHW and percent coral bleached was highly significant ( slope = 3.41, intercept = 26.94, DF = 359, p <0.0001, r 2 = 0.24).

Importantly, a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was associated with a highly significant reduction in the risk of EBV reactivation (HR 0.10, CI 0.03–0.33; P =0.0001).