Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Follow-up ANOVAs showed highly significant differences between ranges in four thermal variables with non-native localities having a narrower mean diurnal range of temperature (BIO 2; F 1,153 = 299.87, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.66), greater temperature seasonality (BIO 4; F 1,153 = 15560.69, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.99), lower minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO 6; F 1,153 = 47.29, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.24), and greater annual range of temperature (BIO 7; F 1,153 = 179.08, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.54), but no difference in maximum temperature of the warmest month (BIO 5; F 1,153 = 3.41, P = 0.0667, R 2 = 0.02).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Underestimation of FDG uptake in bone was also found on MR/PET due to an under-correction of cortical bone when creating an MR-based attenuation map, although there was a highly significant correlation between the SUVs for MR/PET and PET/CT ( p < 0.0001) ( 45 ).
Integrated whole body MR/PET: where are we?
Korean J Radiol · 2015 · PMC4296276
quite significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The authors claimed that survival decreased by 0.6%/d and pelvic control decreased by 0.7%/d for each additional day of treatment beyond 55 days for all stages of disease. Similarly, a study conducted by Lanciano et al 9 demonstrated a quite significant decrease in survival ( p = 0.0001) and pelvic control ( p = 0.0001) as the OTT increased from less than 6, 6 to 7.9, 8 to 9.9, and greater than 10 weeks.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For age, both the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4mini cohorts demonstrated highly significant departures from the census distribution (GPT-3.5: χ 2(17) = 1310.4, p < 0.0001; GPT-4mini: χ 2(17) = 1866.1, p < 0.0001), indicating that the age profiles of the simulated patients were not representative of the general population.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The computerized-aided scores showed a moderate to highly significant negative correlation with forced vital capacity (FVC) ( r = −0.490; P < 0.0001), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ( r = −0.675; P < 0.0001) and the single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (DLco) ( r = −0.653; P < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant positive correlations between DW and all genetic variation measures ( r = .729413, p < .0001, t = 6.3977), meaning that a high number of rare markers (high DW) were associated with high genetic variation.