Statistical analysis (unweighted means analysis) indicates that differences between the control and experimental curves are highly significant, with P<0.0001.
Excerpts
, 2015 ), analyses of LD blocks surrounding each highly significant (−log 10 P >4.0) SNP, and curation of a list of candidate genes contained within these blocks (Supplementary Table S3).
The mixed linear model analysis using the SAS procedure PROC MIXED revealed highly significant differences among the genotypes and genotype × environment interactions for SEV and IT ( P <0.0001).
There was a highly significant treatment × week interaction on the number of floor eggs produced (F(11,466) = 3.75, p < 0.0001), suggesting that the effect of treatment differed across weeks, and the LSMeans and Standard error for treatment × week interaction are reported in Table 3 and Figure 9 .
Attending to their age we can consider two groups, one comprised by those with ages under 40 ky (R0, R5, R7 and R8) and the other with ages above 40 ky (R6, R30, R31, U, JT) with highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between the mean age of each group, 36.8 ± 1.59 and 53.4 ± 2.69 ky respectively.
In all three studies, the primary endpoint was achieved, with a highly significant reduction in PANSS total score from baseline to endpoint (p < 0.0001).
Alveolar septal fibrosis was observed in 90.9% of patients with IPF (30/33), whereas none of the control subjects exhibited this finding (0/23), indicating a highly significant difference between groups (Fisher's exact test, P<0.0001).
A highly significant interaction between position and bottle was obtained ( p < 0.0001).
This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
The age‐grouped time‐to‐maximum values were highly significant ( p < .0001).
At 30 days post-injury, B cell-treated animals showed highly significant improvement in Y maze performance (p < 0.0001), with better alternation scores as compared to saline-treated ICH controls and values similar to sham-injured controls ( Fig. 2 E).
Forty-three of the 90 with a diagnosis other than tuberculosis had non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease. Patient characteristics Of the 925 patients, 526 were men and 399 women; 447 were white, 337 came from the Indian sub- continent (ISC) ,46 were Black-African, 26 Black- Caribbean, and 69 from other ethnic groups. Severity There were highly significant associations between sputum smear positivity and the presence of cavitation (continuity adjusted /- = 111.2; 5df; p <0.0001) and Table 1.
It turns out that all profile 4 insertion sites are close to Met4-targeted genes (average distance 1.4 kb), which is highly significant comparing with random sites (p-value < 10 −4 ; Fig 4A , S5 Fig ; Methods).
The level of education was found to be highly significant (p=.0001) with the kind of health services availed, like ANC registration, ultrasonography, Tetanus Toxoid, adopting balanced dietary pattern and use of iron and folic acid tablets.
Intragroup comparisons were highly significant (P < 0.0001), confirming effective microbial control.
With respect to specific oral mucosal lesions, highly significant association p<0.0001; Odd ratio 4.275, CI 2.798-6.534 was found between coated tongue with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The antibody increase was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a 28-fold GMC increase (95% CI: 17–43-fold) ( Figure 2 B).
The telomere length differences measured between AD and non-AD and between mild, moderate and severe AD were highly significant ( Table 2 , p < 0.0001) as non-caregiver controls were participating in the current study.
Our model results showed a highly significant interaction (χ 2 = 94.3, P < .0001) [ 27 ], confirming a difference in patterns of deferral by CD4 count and patient type.
The increase was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 analysis for trend age vs. hypertension: P < 0.0001 in both sexes).
The mean gait score was 22.12 in the bipolar prosthesis group in comparison to 26.55 in the THR group and was highly significant (p value< 0.0001).
However, the corresponding global F ST was highly significant ( p < .0001), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) did not include 0 (0.00435–0.00828), indicating the presence of genetic structuring across the study area.
Such a non-uniform distribution is highly significant ( P <0.0001, Fisher exact test (75, 151; 204, 22)).
This difference was highly significant with a large effect size ( t (119) = –5.6, p < 0.0001, d = 0.98).
Comparison between before 24 weeks gestations and at 37 weeks gestations showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.0001) in fasting blood glucose level.