predicted conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol to previtamin D3 Linear regression of predicted against actual conversion rates showed a strong and highly significant association (r 2 = 0.82, p < 0.0001, see Fig. 3 ).
Excerpts
The difference in OS between the LTS and STS patients was highly significant (HR = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.07; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 B).
The difference between the rate of episodes with no MVPA in team and individual sport was highly significant (p<0.0001); so is the sex difference in the rate of zero-MVPA episodes within individual sport, though not team sport.
By the end of the experiment, all treatment groups, especially the combination therapy, demonstrated a highly significant decline in disease severity ( p < 0.0001).
A decrease in numbers of mosquitoes collected post-treatment at the ATSB treatment site, when compared with the control site, was highly significant for both females (t = 8.747, df = 13; p < 0.0001) and males (t = 11.91, df = 13; p < 0.0001).
Total AHSS scores at 1 h post-alcohol intake were 2.21 ± 1.10 in the HDB1098 group and 3.21 ± 2.30 in the placebo group, and those at 24 h post-alcohol intake were 3.21 ± 2.30 in the HDB1098 group and 7.79 ± 3.33 in the placebo group, showing a highly significant difference between the groups ( p < 0.0001) similarly to the AHS survey.
The quadratic equation so obtained presented a highly significant effect (p < 0.0001) of the solid lipid, surfactant concentration, and sonication time on the PS values.
Cryoprecipitate use followed a similar trend, showing a highly significant p - value [ p < .0001] and providing strong evidence against the null hypnosis.
There was a highly significant improvement in DHI and HIT-6 at pre- vs. postoperative ( p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively).
Indeed, the genetic differentiation between the American and European continents that was detected by cpSSRs was high ( F ST = 0.369), and highly significant (P <0.0001).
Overall, the effect of visual condition (EC/ EO) was highly significant ( F = 55.6, p < 0.0001), whereas there were no significant interactions between (a) subjects group (PSP, IPD, CTR) and visual condition (EC/EO, F = 0.63, p = 0.53), and (b) segment, subject group, and visual condition ( F = 0.54, p = 0.70, Figures 3b , c , g , h , m , n ).
We observed a highly significant association between appropriate use of IV PPI with respect to endoscopic procedure ( P = 0.0001).
Specifically, for this disease we observed a highly significant difference between the two different considered periods of time ( p < 0.0001), confirmed by a highly significant correlation considering the pre-pandemic nine-year period and the pandemic one ( p = 0.0047).
rs202071893(A/G), AG heterozygous genotype had a highly significant association with HER2 + receptor ( P = 0.0001, OR = 3.021, and, RR = 2.170) compared to wild type AA showed a significant protective association ( P = 0.0141, OR = 0.246, and, RR = 0.3073) and mutant GG genotype showed non-significant association. rs367917640(G/C), CC showed a protective association (( P = 0.0031, OR = 0.09805, and, RR = 0.1281).
These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by anova ).
LVEF ≤ 0.45 was the single independent and highly significant predictor of early CHF among other clinical and echocardiographic variables (odds ratio 17.0; [95% CI 4.1 - 70.8]; p < 0.0001).
The Likelihood Ratio test was highly significant, indicating significant effect of the covariates on response (p < 0.0001).
Looking at the association between BCR reactivity of DLBCL cells and the presence of hypophosphorylated Ars2 isoform overall, considering data from both cell lines and cases with cryospecimenderived recombinant Fab, the association was statistically highly significant (Fisher exact t -test: two-tailed P <0.0001).
The wear rate showed a statistically highly significant difference between the two liners after 12 ( p < 0.0001), 18 ( p = 0.018) and 24 ( p = 0.002) months (Fig. 5 , Table 2 ).
Dextrose and yeast extract could act as limiting nutrients because the squared effects of the two variables were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
All group differences were highly significant (p<0.0001).
Specifically, in Model III, the HRs increased to 1.33 (95% CI: 1.05–1.68) for Q2, 1.40 (95% CI: 1.11–1.77) for Q3, and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.28–2.06) for Q4 (all p < 0.01), with a significant trend ( p < 0.0001).
SLEDAI and rSLEDAI displayed strong positive correlations, with correlation coefficients of 0.63 and 0.63, respectively, with highly significant P values ( P < 0.0001).
Both cRBF and eGFR demonstrated a highly significant increase at 3 months compared to baseline (mean cRBF 251.71 ± 78.27 vs. 486.61 ± 156.08 ml/kidney/min, p = 0.0001; mean eGFR 46.62 ± 16.36 vs. 69.81 ± 24.83 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ; p = 0.02) and remained consistent until the end of the observed period.
Population analysis Linkage disequilibrium tests performed on the whole sample were highly significant ( I A S : 0.0703; P <10 −4 ) and the pairwise variance (V D : 4.3845) was greater than the 95% critical value ( L : 2.6948).