Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Migration assays revealed that PRF caused a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and higher than 15-fold increase (19.3-fold for DF, 18-fold for PDL, and 17.1-fold for AB) in the number of migrated cells when compared to DMEM medium, while platelet-poor plasma (PPP) only caused a moderate 5–10-fold increase in the number of migrated cells (7.8-fold for DF, 5-fold for PDL, and 7.1-fold for AB). 3.3.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In both conditions, there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between experimental groups and control groups in learning per hour of instruction as measured by the test, confirming the intuitive judgment that one hour’s instruction replacing four months instruction demonstrates far greater efficiency in learning.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A decreasing trend was seen in the diameter of the nanofibres upon adding more micro-capsules, with 16% PMD micro-capsules showing the smallest average diameter and a large size distribution (386 ± 55 nm) against the blank (408 ± 67 nm). The results presented in figure 3 b–d show that the emulsion spun nanofibres with permethrin, catnip and chilli oil had a highly significant effect on the average diameter of the resulting nanofibres (all p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Intraclass correlation analysis for somatic signs showed an estimate for heritability of 0.668 in mecamylamine treated animals and 0.318 in saline treated mice, consistent with the highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in somatic signs caused by mecamylamine treatment of nicotine‐exposed mice (11.82) versus saline treatment (3.24).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Quantitative analysis revealed that the median percentage of CCL5-positive area in the IBD group was 4.170%, significantly higher than 0.3450% in the healthy control group, with a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 11 B).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Total AHSS scores at 1 h post-alcohol intake were 2.21 ± 1.10 in the HDB1098 group and 3.21 ± 2.30 in the placebo group, and those at 24 h post-alcohol intake were 3.21 ± 2.30 in the HDB1098 group and 7.79 ± 3.33 in the placebo group, showing a highly significant difference between the groups ( p < 0.0001) similarly to the AHS survey.