Excerpts

The difference in seropositivity according to island was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Three marker haplotype analyses revealed highly significant differences between CD patients and control subjects ( χ 2 = 29.9, df = 7, P = .0001) and UC cases and controls ( χ 2 = 46.3, df = 7, P < .0001).

9 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) results for the model showed it to be highly significant overall (F = 427.62, p < 0.0001) (Table 3 ).

Prosocial Attitudes The effect of MSIS on prosocial attitudes, as investigated in 48 experiments, was highly significant ( g = 0.49, 95% CI [0.40; 0.57], z = 11.37, p < .0001; Figure 2 ).

The biodistribution analysis confirmed a highly significant uptake of the radiotracer in the ischemic region of the myocardium 2 h pCI (19.46 ± 2.26% ID/g, P < 0.0001) and 4 h pCI (9.16 ± 2.03% ID/g, P < 0.0001) compared to 5 min pCI (3.2 ± 0.67% ID/g) and the sham-operated animals (2.46 ± 0.84% ID/g, Fig. 1d ).

ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of genotype (F 1,54 = 206.8, p<0.0001), but no significant effects of treatment (F 1,54 = 0.07, p=0.80) or genotype x treatment interaction (F 1,54 = 0.31, p=0.58).

The model F-values were found to be highly significant for both responses (vesicle size and entrapment efficiency), with p-values < 0.0001 for vesicle size and 0.0014 for entrapment efficiency.

This difference was highly significant ( Χ 2(284) = 51.31, p < 0.0001), and post hoc comparisons confirmed that the preferred location had higher performance than both medium- and least-preferred (both p < 0.0001), whereas there was no difference between medium- and least-preferred ( p = 0.0958).

There was a highly significant correlation between 3‐epi‐25‐OH‐D 3 and 25‐OH‐D 3 concentrations ( r = 0.77, R 2 = 0.5911, slope = 0.0579, p < 0.0001).

However, mixed effects modelling revealed a significant trend for increasing LG at each timepoint (R2=.2, p<0.0001, PMA fixed effect, random intercept per infant).

The difference among the groups was highly significant ( χ 2 : 24.98; P <0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).

The effects of Training Protocol and Alternate Context on discrimination ratios were analyzed using ANOVA, which yielded a highly significant effect of Alternate Context ( F (1,65) = 22.650, P < 0.0001), confirming that generalization between Contexts A and S was stronger than that between Contexts A and RFS.

At 0–6 m, hippocampal loss in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease was already highly significant ( P < 0.0001), whereas the loss in normal became significant in the 0–12 m interval only ( P = 0.005).

Changes in semen parameters There was a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in mean sperm count in animals treated with HAART (0.74 ± 0.30 × 10 6 /mL), HAART + VCO (0.93 ± 0.34 × 10 6 /mL) and VCO (1.86 ± 0.54 × 10 6 /mL) respectively when compared with control (5.67 ± 0.26 × 10 6 /mL).

The results were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

When comparing typical anti‐MAG neuropathy patients with typical CIDP patients in univariate analysis, a highly significant difference between the proportion of patients with and without supportive and unsupportive features was confirmed ( p < 0.0001 for each of the seven features).

Patients with presence of vascular invasion also showed a significant trend toward worse overall survival ( Table 2 ; Figure 2C ) and recurrence-free survival ( Figure 2D ) compared to the patients with absence of vascular invasion ( P <0.0001).

All the differences between the different network types were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant negative correlation between RUNX3 and vimentin protein was observed in these gastric cancer samples ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 8 C).

The one way ANOVA test revealed a highly significant difference (P-value<0.0001) in the average number of in-chorion contractions between dose groups, and the Tukey-Kramer HSD test identified all pairwise differences as significant at a familywise error rate of 0.05.

All correlations were highly significant ( P < .0001).

RESULTS: Medians of liver stiffness measurement by shear wave velocity showed a significant increase as a grade of liver fibrosis increases (p ≤ 0.0001, highly significant).

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis confirmed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) 3.51 fold upregulation of XLOC_032517 expression after vaccination compared to the time point prior vaccination (Figure 2 B).

IL-19 and beta-defensin expression were also strongly correlated with each other ( r = 0.81) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001), suggesting that both biomarkers are involved in the same pathway of psoriasis pathogenesis.

We found that performance on the digital cognitive battery and EC tau proved to be more predictive of diagnostic status than Aβ and performance on the digital cognitive battery was qualitatively better compared to tau, and this approached significance (digital cognitive battery vs cortical Aβ p < 0.0001, EC tau vs cortical Aβ p < 0.01, digital cognitive battery vs EC tau p = 0.07).