Excerpts

Notably, TG7 and TG1 exhibit a highly significant increase in gene expression compared to normal human testes ( n = 3, **** p < 0.0001).

The interspecific comparison revealed highly significant differences in both male and female body weights (see Fig. 2 ) and in M m /M f ratios ( ANOVA , F (9,50) = 8.21, P < 0.0001 ).

The much wider spread observed in ∆2 compared to ∆1 indicates a greater similarity between results obtained by LD-PCR and pyrosequencing than between LD-PCR and NGS on the MiSeq platform, which is highly significant according to a folded F Test ( p = 0.0001).

Specifically, the interaction effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the combined influence of MTG concentration and incubation time is critical for understanding their impact on leakage properties.

This difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Changing the patient selection, of course, resulted in highly significant outcome changes: Women undergoing fresh cycles now were, suddenly, significantly younger ( P = 0.0001) (previously significantly older) in the complete autologous group ( P < 0.0001) and significant differences in AMH and FSH to the benefit of frozen cycles completely disappeared, together with all prior outcome advantages in pregnancy rates for frozen cycles ( P = 0.0086 before and P = 0.0451 after adjustment for age and AMH).

In all cases we found that this enrichment is highly significant at p < 10 -4 .

In addition, we discarded SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1% over the entire data set or with a highly significant departure of individual genotype frequencies from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations ( P < 10 − 4 ) in at least one population.

While the correlations between SPAD measurements and disease severity scores were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), they were relatively weak except for SM, which is a binary metric in which only disease severity levels of 1 (not affected) or 5 (severely affected) were observed.

Urea, ALT, AST and AFP were highly significant in post-hepatitic HCC patients than control group (P ≤0.0001).

After chemotherapy, we observed a highly significant decline of DNA content in the LMWF to a median value of 380 ng/ml (range 40 – 1790 ng/ml) (p = 0.0001).

The regression model of the response surface analysis indicated an extremely significant result with p < 0.0001, demonstrating its statistical significance.

A simple regression of ranks of male participants and female participants in the couples’ group showed a highly significant positive relationship, R = .997, Y = 0.14+0.97, F(1,6) = 105.7, p<.0001, confirming that the preference for the different morphs were nearly identical for both sexes.

TRAT1 and KLRK1 were also highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and ROC analysis revealed 83.3% sensitivity and 96.77% specificity for TRAT1 counts >213, and 100% sensitivity and 96.77% specificity for KLRK1 counts >292.5.

Furthermore, the 1745 cm −1 band (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 ]]> O stretching of esters/lipids) exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between treated and untreated bacteria, particularly for 1a and 1b, suggesting perturbations in the lipid components of the cell envelope or extracellular matrix.

The aptamer MS10-Trunc yielded a very high sensitivity and specificity (>97%) with a highly significant discrimination ( *** p < 0.0001) between CSF from TBM and non-TBM subjects.

From the results, it was obvious to see that the regression of this model was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001).

On the other hand, the group of subjects who received PI vaccination showed a trend toward an increase in the median IgG titer (median values of 0.3 to 579 (P<0.0001), 0.00–401.4 (P = 0.3125), and 971.3 to 2163 (P = 0.3008) in group 1,2, and 3 respectively), except slight decrease of IgG value for Group 4 (median value of 1067 to 1021; P = 0.9717).

Intra-group comparison of PPD and CAL in the three anxiety levels showed increased periodontal destruction with an increase in anxiety levels, the results being statistically highly significant for PPD differences in smokers (P < 0.0001).

The differences in mean antibody response levels between the groups for both net OD 1.0 and OD 1.0 ratio 2 weeks after third vaccination were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test).

Whether the scan was task or rest-based made a small but highly significant difference in the maps correlations (z = 0.40 vs. z = 0.36, t(446) = −6.50, P < 0.0001).

Intragroup reductions from baseline remained highly significant at all time points in both groups (p = 0.0001).

Two-way ANOVA shows highly significant differences [F(1,24)=31.5, p<0.0001] between HAT genes expression in controls and embryos injected with well described Dystrophin morpholino cocktail (also see Materials and methods, S1 Fig A ).

When considering only the change from the capital-adjusted model, surgical volume accounted for 54% of the remaining variation, and this improvement was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 5 ). 4.

There were highly significant differences (P < 0001) between the analysed mean Hg, As and turbidity levels and the permissible levels in surface water with the potential of affecting ecosystem services including water for drinking, water for recreational, water for irrigational, and water for aqua culture purposes.