Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As for night-time, wakefulness during daytime, occupied the highest proportion (60.4 ± 1.8%) compared with the percentages of drowsiness, NREM sleep and REM sleep (9.4 ± 0.8%; 23.4 ± 1.5% and 6.7 ± 0.6%, respectively) and these differences were found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001) ( Fig 5C ).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
RML-inoculated transgenic mice reached terminal disease after 400 ± 56 dpi (n = 10), whereas WTPrP C mice became terminally sick at 155 ± 1.6 dpi (n = 8), thus also showing a highly significant delay for PrP C GPIThy-1-expressing mice (Log Rank (Mantel-Cox)**** p <0.0001; S6A Fig ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Adding more biological replicates to the qPCR log 2 FC calculation decreased the correlation with the microarray log 2 FCs [ Supplementary Figure S2 (‘all samples’ linear regression model); r 2 = 0.703], but the linear regression model remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The second validation step performed by MS-qPCR on core biopsies from 131, 59 and 36 patients with histologically diagnosed PCa, BPH and high-grade PIN, respectively, showed highly significant differences in the methylation status of the APC, TACC2, RARB, DGKZ, C5orf4 and HES5 regions between BPH and PCa ( P <0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical modelling of FICI values The results of the Wald χ 2 tests from the fitted linear mixed-effects model evaluating FICI values indicated that antibacterial combination had a strong and highly significant main effect on FICI values ( p < 0.0001), as did compound ratio ( p < 0.0001), indicating that both the identity of the combination and the dosage ratio influenced the degree of synergism.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From baseline (day 0) to the end of DB (day 84), the severity of headache/migraine decreased by −1.6 ± 0.9 (-2.0) points in the ERr 731® group and by −0.2 ± 0.8 [0,0] points in the placebo group resulting in a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) in the severity as well as in the decrease of symptoms between the two treatment groups ( Figure 2 ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Difference-in-difference analysis demonstrated a highly significant 31.4 min (95% CI −46.8 to −16.1; p<0.0001) reduction in the bimonthly median door-to-scan time for patients on anticoagulants 4–48 hours post onset following implementation of the prealert ( figure 1 ).