Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant positive correlation of first two principal axes ( f1 and f2 ) with U% ( f1 = 0.411, f2 = 0.187; p < 0.0001), and negative correlation with A%( f1 = -0.149, f2 = -0.168; p < 0.0001) and C% ( f1 = -0.379, f2 = -0.111; p < 0.0001), indicates that compositional constraints (especially U and C nucleotides) affected the codon usage bias of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Table S3).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the present study, untreated diabetic animals (Group II) exhibited a marked increase in water intake, reaching mean values of 31.2 ± 9.4 mL/day, compared to 10.8 ± 3.2 mL/day in the normal control group (Group I), the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Fisher's exact testing of 35SNP_wildliving_dead_cats against 35SNP_historical_cats for wildcats (Q_35 ≥ 0.75) versus non‐wildcat (Q_35 < 0.75) was highly significant (odds ratio = 0.023, p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In particular: “Working duties” and “Change in the institute of reference” are highly significant (p < 0.0001). “Difficulties in the use of technology”, “Family duties”, “Worsening of health conditions”, and “No response” show significant differences with p < 0.05. “Laziness” does not show a significant difference (p > 0.05). 4.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effect of Process Variables on Sphericity Factor and Roundness Table 2 shows that both the sphericity factor and roundness were significantly influenced by the independent variables with highly significant regression models ( p < 0.0001), high coefficients of determination (R 2 > 0.98) and non-significant lack of fit ( p > 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences in the levels of neutrophils, RBCs, PCV, Hb, MCH, urea, creatinine, total protein, albumin, globulin, A/G ratio, and PCT ( p < 0.0001 for each), as well as CRP ( p = 0.002), among infections caused by PDR, XDR, and MDR isolates.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Also, the random effects were not centered on 0, with highly significant deviations ( p < 0.0001) for the apparent central volume of distribution (V2/F), the apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V3/F), and T lag ; and the largest deviation corresponding to a 43% higher V2/F.