Excerpts

During the baseline, ETD was already lower in Brasília Teimosa (emmean 9.16 ETD, 95% CI 8.03–10.28) than in Pina (12.2 ETD, 95% CI 10.8–13.7), with a highly significant difference (GLMM, estimate = −0.29, SE = 0.015, P < 0.0001).

At 3 months the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated a highly significant difference among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis H 3 = 23.42; 4 groups, n = 32, p < 0.0001).

Unsurprisingly, the choice of antibiotic had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001, F = 43.0).

The highly significant differences in plasma progesterone levels between the follicular and premenstrual phases were equally strong for both groups (p < 0.0001).

The association between MUC1 and Rab31 expression was highly significant (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001) in that MUC1-positive tumors were more likely than MUC1-negative tumors to express Rab31 (n = 22, 88.0% vs. n = 8, 6.56%).

There was a highly significant direct correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient r = 0.72; P < 0.0001) between the mean lesion size of the adenoma cases and the percentage of significant different texture features between adenomas and carcinomas.

A two-way ANOVA analysis shows that the variable % of AcEt/TFA is extremely significant, affecting 95.13% of total result variance, with a p -value < 0.0001.

Chi-squared tests confirmed that these differences were highly significant in all three years (p < 0.0001).

Likewise we observed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) difference in mean survival time with an average of 102 months in the group of breast cancer patients who died of CCVD and an average of 61 months in the group who died of breast cancer.

However, as expected, CST was a highly significant predictor of community composition (R 2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001).

Construct validity of the DFS-A Scale The exploratory factor analysis of the DFS-A scale showed a KMO measure of 0.92 indicating adequate sampling adequacy and a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of sphericity (χ 2 = 3205.10, df = 190, p value < 0.0001).

This difference in the response to the 125 I-UdR therapy between the T78 and T87 GSCs, with T87 being the most resistant, was highly significant (p<0.0001).

The difference in pre-injury and post-injury cesarean sections was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The two-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant effect of the culture medium on mycelial growth F (1,44) = 90.128; p < 0.0001.

However, purge loss in cured pork sausages was highly significant with the addition of ligands ( p < 0.0001; Table 2 ), with cysteine treatment showing higher purge loss than histidine and nicotinamide treatments ( p < 0.05; Table 3 ).

The difference between Swissprot and the ‘named’ group was again highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Results: We found a highly significant reduction of circulating pDCs ( p < 0.0001) and in bone marrow ( p < 0.0001) of MM patients compared to HD.

Each WHtR cutoff was a highly significant predictor ( P < 0.0001) with the inclusion of constructs for race, smoking, age, and sex.

Among those significant SNPs, 1,498 SNPs from the Cmax group, 65 SNPs from the T max group, and 1,491 SNPs from the AUC inf group showed highly significant associations with each parameter ( Table 2 , 3 and 4 , P<0.0001).

These changes were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and concentration-dependent, being observable at day 7 of differentiation, in particular regarding CD11b expression ( Figure 2 F,G; Figure S3F,G ).

Moreover, during development, these offspring showed a markedly greater increase in body weight, demonstrating an apparent trend toward obesity ( P < 0.0001) ( Fig 2b ).

Biochemical profile outside of acute decompensations Plasma amino acid levels differed significantly with disease status and age, showing a highly significant interaction for glycine (p = 0.0001; Table 1 A).

Tables 4 and 5 present the results of a three-level model of LBW assessing the interaction between world region of origin and destination, which was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Overall, the full-null model comparison was clearly significant, χ 8 2 = 60.932 , p < 0.0001.

There was a nonsignificant trend toward an increase in CD8‐positive T cells (Fig 3I , ANOVA P < 0.0001) at day 4 ( P = 0.1503), but at 7 days follow‐up, CD8 T cells were significantly reduced in PEGSerp‐1‐treated infected mice ( P < 0.0303), similar to trends observed with CD4‐stained cells.