SZ) were both highly significant with F = 12,503 ( p < 0.001) and F = 12,096 ( p = 0.001), respectively.
Excerpts
A highly significant difference (P<0.001, two-sided) in survivals was detected, favouring the treatment group.
Additionally, there were highly significant correlations between two values estimated by data average and data moving average (800-second data processing: amplitude r=1.000 [p<0.001], MESOR r=0.838 [p<0.001], acrophase r=1.000 [p<0.001]).
Post-diagnostic PA levels were associated with a significant trend ( P < 0.001) of decreased all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, which was stronger among older women (aged 50–74 years) and did not differ across categories of body mass index.
In addition, the results of the Cochran Q test are highly significant ( Q = 454.41, p < 0.001).
Cla at into group A (<20'!.) and group B (> 20% of cels staming postively for the p53 protein). Group B patents had a highly significant risk of proson (P<0.001, log-rank test).
With a highly significant F value of 1,009.134 and P value <0.001 for the 5 μM concentration, the mean percentage viability of H1299 cells ( Table 7 ) decreases from 72.25% (±2.39) at 5 μM to 48.84% (±1.17) at 30 μM and 27.63% (±0.59) at 50 μM EGCG, confirming the repeatability of this dose-dependent response.
The distribution of underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity by geographic area (urban, rural, indigenous regions), as estimated by the surveys ENV II 2003, ENV III 2008 and PREFREC – 2010, is presented in Figure 5 , and in all areas it had an increasing trend (p<0.001).
In this controlled context ( Figure 7 ), a highly significant Treatment × Genotype × Root layer interaction ( p < 0.001) was observed for five traits.
A highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) was observed over the range of scores by individual panelists.
The association between dry eye and conjunctival congestion was found to be statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001).
Of these, seven made a highly significant contribution (p<0·001): age 12–17 years, substance use, psychotic disorder, intellectual disability, behavioural disorders, anxiety disorders, and being admitted in duty time (recorded as 1600 h to 0800 h).
17,599) The results of the T-test showed that this decline was highly significant. t (106) = 5.2858, P < 0.001 (Table 2 ).
The estimated trend for indications was negative and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all cases.
This M/F difference is highly significant (χ 2 p -value < 0.001) Next, we compared recombination rates in male and female meiosis interval-by-interval ( Figure 1 C).
A highly significant negative correlation with GAF was obtained (r = -0.903; p < 0.001) pointing to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity.
A highly significant (p-value = 0.001) age factor for the severity and prevalence of sleep apnea was also observed in this study.
We interpret this as follows: the discovery cohort had an extremely small sample size (only 6 pooled samples), and FDR correction tends to be overly conservative; however, all three candidate proteins exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in ELISA assays conducted in an independent large-sample validation cohort ( n = 260).
Multivariate analysis identified three of the 49 variables as highly significant independent predictors for the development of mediastinitis: obesity (OR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01; 1.04] p = 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.30, 95% CI [1.58; 6.88], p = 0.001), and bilateral grafting of the internal mammary artery (OR 3.18, 95% CI [1.20; 8.43] p = 0.02).
The relationship between Prin1 and MSTT remains highly significant ( p < 0.001) after Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons.
Results: Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( P < 0 . 001 ) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively).
Post-hoc comparisons (least significant difference; Bonferroni corrected level of significance p < .004) revealed highly significant differences between controls and all three groups of anxiety disorders ( p < .001) and non-significant results between the groups of anxiety disorders ( p = .625 to .838).
Results and Discussion Systematic environmental effects Breed, sex, year, and the linear regression on age were highly significant ( P < 0.001) in the preliminary model.
Regionally, snow damage showed a similar trend in each of the 6 the regions (linear trend, p<0.001 for all regions), whereas wind showed a decreasing trend only in some regions (linear trend, p<0.001 only for regions 4, 5 and 6) as well as browsing (linear trend, p = 0.02 for region 6).
A highly significant correlation was highlighted with the Standard Progressive Matrices Subtest of the Raven test (r = 0.34, p < 0.001), and a value close to significance was found with WISC-V matrices (r = −0.13, p = 0.08).