Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on a simple linear mixed model, a highly significant ( p < 0.001) relationship between GFR (=Cl IOH ) and BW was demonstrated, expressed by the equation: (1) GFR (mL/min) = 4.11 + 1.59 × BW (kg) (R 2 = 0.90) The GFR and BW were highly correlated, therefore it was decided to further analyze the impact of sex and species on the GFR/BW using mixed effects models.
highly significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In LAN-1, 8 μM ( ̃2-fold IC 50 ) of nemorosone increased the portion of cells in G0/G1-phase over a period of 24 hrs in a highly significant manner (n = 3, P ≤ 0.001), while simultaneously decreasing the percentage of cells in S-phase ( Fig. 1A ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant differences between temperature, pH, or turbidity were observed between the two lakes over the study period ( p > 0.05); however, significant and highly significant differences between the two lakes across the sampling period were observed for dissolved oxygen ( p < 0.001), chlorophyll a and b levels ( p < 0.01, p < 0.001), and carotenoids ( p < 0.001) with dissolved oxygen demonstrating the most difference between lakes. 2.3.
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Pain experience Stepwise multivariable regression analyses resulted in an AIC-minimized model in which only the recollected pain score of the previous mammogram was a highly significant (p < .001) predictor for the reported pain scores (Model 1 in Table 1 ).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The PLSCA results for the lower cervix (C5-T1) ( Fig 2a and 2c ) revealed the measured inertia (47.65; odds = 25:1000) in the healthy subjects to be much greater than the corresponding value in the MS patients (16.21; odds = 767:1000), with the difference between the odds being highly significant (p<0.001; effect size = 1.072).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of contingency tables, evaluated against ground-truth labeling, revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the diagnostic accuracies of ICH identification between RAPID ICH and the first-year radiology resident. 3.4.