By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.
Excerpts
This suggestion is supported by the fact that the effect of polarization contrast is highly significant when we fit separate models for positive (χ 2 (1) = 28.36, p < 0.001) and negative (χ 2 (1) = 25.4, p < 0.001) contrasts.
Specifically, EH demonstrated a highly significant negative causal relationship with BAG across all three methods (IVW: OR = 0.813, 95% CI: 0.736–0.980, p < 0.001; weighted median: OR = 0.748, 95% CI: 0.657–0.853, p < 0.001).
The 2024 cohort (Group 2) exhibited a significantly higher proportion of affected permanent teeth, at 29.6%, compared to only 6.8% in the 2020 cohort (Group 1), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), as shown in Table 3 .
The result was highly significant— F (16.02, 4236.45) = 81.65, p < 0.001, with Greenhouse-Geiser correction for violations of sphericity.
Differences between BFLA and ESLA for individual parental responses were statistically highly significant, χ 2 (2, N = 49) = 35.753, p < 0.001 9 .
The most pronounced differences were observed in SAH groups: males exhibited severe vasospasm (2.343 ± 0.632), whereas females showed moderate vasospasm (1.268 ± 0.492); this sex difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Among patients without calcification at baseline, by the end of 4-year follow-up, 42.7% had CAC progression, 57.5% had AAC progression, 33.5% had CVC progression, and 68.5% had total VC progression, which represented an increasing trend over the study period ( P < .001 for trend for all comparisons) (eTable 2 in Supplement 1 ).
* p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 very significant, *** p ≤ 0.005 highly significant and **** p ≤ 0.001 most significant.
The overall results indicated a good fit with a highly significant log likelihood ratio ( P <.001 for Wald 2 ; see Table 4 ).
An RCT in overweight PCOS patients ( n = 122) found highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001) in the primary outcome of oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea after 3 months of treatment. 44 The trial compared effect of a LI alone, with LI plus a botanical medicine protocol.
The model showed a highly significant likelihood ratio test ( p < 0.001). 4.
All raw data were analyzed through 3 repeated tests, and the results were presented as means ± SD, in which significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) were analyzed.
This size class decreased with plant development, with a non-significant decrease ( p > 0.1) from the seedling to the flowering stage, and a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001) from the flowering to the fruiting stage.
Known-groups validity All known-group difference analyses of MDF-Fibro-17scores were highly significant ( p < 0.001) when performed using quintiles.
Within the CCA the overall RDA model of assemblage structure versus sample year was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.23, p<0.001) as were pairwise comparisons between individual years (2002 vs 2003 R 2 = 0.22, 2003 vs. 2004 R 2 = 0.12; p<0.001 for both).
DeLong test comparisons of correlated ROC curves demonstrated that OPS showed a statistically significant advantage over CRP alone for in-hospital mortality (Z = 2.84, p = 0.004; Figure 5 C) and showed a strong trend toward improved discrimination for one-year mortality (Z = 4.41, p < 0.001; Figure 5 D).
There was a highly significant correlation between Digit RAN and reading fluency (r = −0.782, P < 0.001; Fig. 1b ).
This approach yielded highly significant common scale parameters ( p < 0.001), as indicated by the lower AIC value, effectively capturing the variability in nymph development with respect to temperature.
increasingly complex non-linearities of model stage), stopping at the number of knots that gave the best fitting model (based on linear mixed effect model comparisons, as implemented in the lmerTest package).There was a highly significant main effect of ROI ( F = 330.7, p < 0.001) reflecting the fact that overall model fit decreases as one moves from EVC to pVTC to PrC (which could be because of differences in the level of noise in the fMRI data across these ROIs).
The Chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 20.92, df = 1, P < 0.001), which was further confirmed by Fisher’s exact test ( P = 9.50 × 10 -6 ).
Multiple regression analysis confirmed that membership of the clinical sample remained a highly significant predictor, p < .001, when age was controlled for.
An one-way ANOVA confirms that the differences between the groups are highly significant ( F 2, 3963 =22.72, p <0.001).
Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that these differences were highly significant ( F (2, 287) = 3961.048; p < 0.001; e 2 = 0.932) (Figure 3 ).
The analysis for error rates resulted in a highly significant O-R compatibility effect ( F (1,29) = 21.39, p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.425) with an average of 11.2% errors in the compatible condition and 14.8% errors in the incompatible condition.