Statistical analysis using paired sample t -test for the difference in CT and MRI tumor volume was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Excerpts
When calculating associations between use of any instrument and diagnostic and forensic conclusions, we found highly significant associations between both outcomes and the use of any instrument ( p < 0.001).
Statistical analyses were performed using a two-tail Fisher-exact test: P -values ≤ 5.00e-2 (a = 0.05) were taken to be significant (1.00e-2 ≤ P ≤ 5.00e-2 * significant; 1.00e-3 ≤ P ≤ 1.00e-2 ** very significant; P < 1.00e-3 *** highly significant).
Within-profile analysis for the “Low Profile” was explored using a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, which revealed a highly significant effect of the cognitive domain on performance (F(3, 180) = 41.13, p < 0.001), with a large, generalized effect size (η 2 G = 0.344).
A Kruskal–Wallis test detected highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences between groups in both measures due to lower pollen number and fertility of [SpMa]Ma compared with all the others and no differences in the other pairwise comparisons.
3, C and D ) showed the velocity differences to be highly significant (P < 0.001).
Both Zucker groups had reduced concentrations compared with Wistar rats, with fa/fa rats showing highly significant reductions ( p < 0.001).
The fractionated PC also showed a considerably significant ( p < 0.001) prooxidant effect in conjunction with UVA exposure on keratinocytes.
The VAS-score regarding pain showed an highly significant reduction of 74.1%, from 8.5 ± 0.8 to 2.2 ± 0.9 points; difference: 6.3 points ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 8 ).
The differences in positive cells between normal and pterigyum epithelium were highly significant for Hsp90 (P < 0,001).
The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 authors evaluating ET/NT for the validation cohort was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.56-0.90), indicating good reliability and highly significant agreement (F (31, 31) = 4.70, P < 0.001).
A highly significant difference ( p > 0.001) for the female group was approved.
This shows an increasing trend since the start of measurements in 1997, which was statistically significant ( β = 0.541, SE = 0.093, p < .001, OR = 1.717, 95% CI: 1.432, 2.059).
Anodization color main effect The main effect of anodization color was statistically highly significant (F(1, 44) = 696.276; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.941).
ANOVA results in Table 4 show a highly significant effect (F = 129.658, p -value < 0.001), and OLS estimates in Table 5 indicate that vertical scanning angles are associated with higher recall (coefficient = 0.1302).
In girls the difference was highly significant (18.3% of the 11 yo, vs. 25.5% of the 15 yo; p<0.001 among age groups).
Conversely, a decreasing trend was observed for deaths in health facilities ( p < 0.001).
The annual prevalence of CH presented a decreasing trend (from 7.52 to 5.98 per 10,000 births, P < 0.001).
As expected, in the overall analysis of these eight trials, the between-trial heterogeneity was highly significant (concordance = 0.687 with standard error = 0.019; likelihood ratio test = 97.96 on 2 df, p < 0.001; Wald test = 40.92 on 2 df, p < 0.001). 4.
The correlation was highly significant with a value ρ = 0.97 and a P < 0.001.
Further analysis through Dunn’s multiple comparisons test revealed highly significant differences between all paired amplitude groups ( p < 0.001).
Both in males and females significantly increasing trend in BMI, WC, WHR, systolic BP, cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and a decreasing trend in HDL cholesterol levels is observed (regression analyses, p < 0.001).
The trend for increasing risk of low vitamin D with fairer skin types was highly significant despite adjustment for all confounders (p = 0.001).
However, this only occurred when aphids were absent, leading to a highly significant interaction term between inductions and aphids (F 3,298 = 11.67, p < 0.001).
Spearman’s correlation between per cent area myxovirus 1 protein immunoreactivity and IFN-dominant mRNA gene cluster expression was highly significant (dermis, rho=0.86, p<0.001).