Excerpts

The scale was regarded highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.830 for the scale and ranging from 0.824 to 0.882 for the subscales; item‐scale and item‐total correlations were reported to be highly significant = p < 0.001) and valid (CFI = 0.990; TLI = 0.983; RMSEA = 0.045) (Husain, Kamal, et al. 2025 ).

Most notably, the candidate serum biomarkers (ORM1, ORM2, AGP) and the vast majority of systemic inflammation composite indices (NLR, MLR, SII, SIRI) showed a highly significant upward trend in the study group (all p < 0.001), suggesting that these indicators are more sensitive in reflecting systemic inflammation of psoriasis compared to conventional blood indicators. 3.2.

The combined ANOVA across all environments showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences among environments and entries for all traits ( Table 2 , Supplemental Table S2).

Treatment modality was a highly significant predictor, with the Digital and AI group showing greater improvement compared with the Conventional group (β = 8.62, 95% CI: 6.75–10.49; p < 0.001).

A decreasing trend in annual NSD incidence was observed (p < 0.001).

Pairwise comparisons revealed a highly significant difference between EU-TIRADS 4 without BWCF and both EU-TIRADS 4 with BWCF ( P < 0.001) and EU-TIRADS 3 ( P < 0.001).

This was highly significant ( P <0.001) for the interaction between trial 4 (4×MIC) and time for L . monocytogenes , S . aureus and S .

Likelihood ratio test indicated that the overall effect was highly significant ( P < .001).

This difference was statistically highly significant ( P <.001).

The composite FTAI, reflecting the overall degree of frontotemporal atrophy, was substantially elevated in SZ (1.09 ± 0.58) and close to zero in HC (0.00 ± 0.53), with a highly significant difference (t = 14.37, p < 0.001).

However, linear regressions demonstrated highly significant relationships of age with YR ( t = 14.1, p < 0.001) and with LTH ( t = 9.4, p < 0.001), an anticipated unavoidable severe bias for which we have used statistical correction.

There was a significant ( P < .01) relief of abdominal pain and highly significant ( P < .001) relief in all the other cardinal features of thalassemia in patients receiving Triphaladi Avaleha [ Table 2 ].

Reversing the causal ordering (hs-CRP → index → CircS) changed the picture: both the CHG index and METS-IR produced clearly significant indirect effects (both ACME P < 0.001), pointing toward a model in which systemic inflammation feeds into CircS risk partly by perturbing atherogenic lipid handling and insulin homeostasis.

As shown in Figure 4B , five module–trait relationships (indicated with red underlines) were highly significant ( P value < 0.001) ( Figure 5B ).

Results Rural ultrasound utilization demonstrated a highly significant increasing trend from 2006 to 2022 (Mann-Kendall τ = 0.927, p < 0.001), with mean exams per site increasing from 485 [SD 341] to 1,101 [SD 953].

The combined ANOVA results revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among the genotypes, locations, and the genotype × locations interaction in response to RLB (Table 3 ).

There was a highly significant positive correlation between sex and the knowledge and attitude scores (r=0.22, r=0.26, P =0.001) where females had more knowledge and positive attitude towards breastfeeding compared to males.

Post-hoc contrasts comparing QoM averages between conditions revealed a highly significant effect ( t(69.8 )=4.86, p <0.001; see top left panel of Figure 5 for QoM averaged across PMs).

Many correlations were strong ( r > .60) and highly significant ( p < .001), exemplified by A3’s strong positive associations with B2 ( r = .714, p < .001), D1 ( r = .716, p < .001), and D3 ( r = .706, p < .001).

In the multivariable model, age remained a highly significant independent predictor (OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.14, P < 0.001), while type 1 diabetes status showed a trend toward significance (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 0.94–3.39, P = 0.078).

Both are highly significant ( F = 12.929, p < 0.001), indicating that the rubric produces stable group quality judgments suitable for Bloom’s “create”-level evaluation.

Non-parametric ANOVA on NEF-based shape variables revealed highly significant differences among species ( F (3,114) = 118.19, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION ON RESULTS The result of the study revealed that, a combination of Brahmyadi compound and Shilajatu Vati has a definite role in lowering BP, which also showed statistically highly significant results with P < 0.001.

Trait-specific responses of okra genotypes under three PEG 6000 levels The effects of genotypes, treatments, and their interaction were highly significant (p< 0.001) for all the estimated growth, root, and biochemical parameters ( Tables 1 , 2 ).

2b ) were highly significant overall (Pseudo-F = 14.68, p = 0.001) and also between all treatments ( Table 2 ).