After propensity score matching, there was a 29.5 % risk reduction of all-cause mortality in MM group compared to control group and the difference in their survival time was highly significant (P < 0.001) by the log-rank test.
Excerpts
Figure 2 depicts the effect of different surface treatment (air abrasive and heat treatment) on the fracture strength of commercially available Ceramill (AMANNGIRRBACH) Zirconia, the result shows highly significant ( P <0.001) in the group 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and statistically significant ( P <0.005) in the group 6.
In fact, women found the app easier to use ( M = 3.98 vs 3.45), and this difference was quite significant ( P < .001).
Within-group changes from baseline to 12 months were highly significant for both subgroups (Wilcoxon P < 0.001 for each).
Only the differences between baseline eCO levels of active and passive cigarette smokers was not significant (p = 0.985) but comparisons among other groups were highly significant (p <0.001).
Similar to the ERG data, the central foveal thickness and mean retinal thickness in the right and left eyes of patients showed highly significant correlations (r 2 = 0.45, p < 0.001; and r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.001, respectively), and we therefore used only the SD-OCT data obtained from the right eye of all subjects for further analysis.
The left ONSD measured a median of 0.35 mm in the asphyxiated group at 24 h, compared to 0.31 mm in the control group, with a highly significant p-value < 0.001.
Differences between transgenic lines and vector control treated insect group were found extremely significant (P<0.001).
Differences between the two groups in terms of outcomes were highly significant ( p = 0.001) [ 45 ].
All structural and functional parameters showed statistically highly significant correlations among each other ( P < 0.001; see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S5 ).
The combined ANOVA of the 36 early maturing maize accessions evaluated under each of the stress conditions showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) mean squares for GY and other measured traits for year, genotypes, and genotype × year interactions.
The interaction of MC and switching was clearly significant, F (1, 39) = 25.018, p < .001, η 2 p = .391, confirming larger error switch costs in the modality-incompatible than in the modality-compatible condition (6.5% vs. 3.5%).
These traits demonstrated highly significant linear responses ( P < 0.001 each), while quadratic effects were not significant ( P = 0.161, 1.000, and 0.283, respectively).
Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant ( p = 0.001) difference between the participants of various designations, indicating that COVID-19 was a SARS-CoV-2 infection. 89.1% of the participants provided the correct answer about the incubation of COVID-19 (2-14days).
Partial correlation analysis between the texture features of the spine and the paraspinal muscles revealed a highly significant correlation for Variance(global) (r = 0.61 for ES, r = 0.62 for PS; p < 0.001 respectively).
One‐way PERMANOVA results indicated that there was a highly significant relationship between PC1, PC2 and diet ( F 1,5 = 3.41, p < 0.001).
Evaluating a total number of 766 punches, the interobserver correlation between the TSS and two experts (JB, AVR) was highly significant for EZH2 ( r s = 0.289; p < 0.001) and H3K27me3 ( r s = 0.796; p < 0.001).
Accordingly, there is highly significant population divergence between the subspecies (K ST = 0.665, p < 0.001, Table 2 ).
Serum IL‐10 levels were significantly elevated on days 5, 7, and 9 postinoculation ( p < 0.05) and reached 73.56 pg/mL on day 21, representing a highly significant increase compared with controls ( p < 0.001).
Compared with the Glu group (negative control), all the biomarkers in the DOX group were increased, and the LDH level exhibited a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001), indicating severe heart injury.
The serum activity of the cardiac evaluation parameters in the fourth week demonstrated a highly significant correlation among the groups with respect to AST and cTnI ( p < .001).
For nanoemulsions, concentration effects were highly significant at 24 h (F (3,48) = 16.17, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.310), 48 h (F (3,48) = 14.74, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.290), and 72 h (F (3,48) = 15.65, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.303).
Though PALI was significantly associated with all forms of cancers, as well as the four most common cancers, the relationship remained highly significant (p < 0.001) after adjustment for confounding for colorectal cancer and marginally significant (p=0.053) for breast cancer.
In a multivariate model that included all relevant univariate predictors, the odds ratio of current medical practice being in an outer vs inner metropolitan area still remained highly significant (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17, 1.97, P = 0.001) (Additional file 1 : Table S2).
Regarding the values for the support needs and strategy indicators, the results showed highly significant correlations between support needs and each informer's assessment with regard to the strategies they received ( r = .90, p < .001 for the individuals with ID and the family members, and r = .85, p < .001 for the professionals).