In contrast, the incidence of Death without the occurrence of Any VT/VF was 6.6% in patients with (S1-S3a)KD and 21.6% in patients with (S3b-S5)KD with a highly significant p -value of p < 0.001 ( Figure 2B ).
Excerpts
The Weshler's Memory Scale total score in memantine group improved significantly after 8 weeks ( P = 0.002) compared with baseline ( P = 0.873) and highly significant at the end of 16 th week ( P < 0.001).
Furthermore, the same model was applied jointly for DNH and Umbergaon (n = 140), which was overall highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).
P < 0.05 was considered significant (*), P < 0.01 was considered highly significant (**), and P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant (***).
The Friedman test indicated highly significant differences in valence scores across the conditions ( χ 2 (2) = 18.38, p < 0.001).
Their co-occurrence matched random assembly process expectations, but presence of the single ectocommensal species had a highly significant negative effect on recruitment of all burrow-wall commensal species ( P < 0.001), including on its burrow-wall commensal sister species ( P < 0.001).
All of these correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Highly significant POD differences were observed in recovery room stay durations for scoPOD (5.18 ± 2.42 h for POD, 2.81 ± 3.28 h for controls, p < 0.001).
MAS was independently associated with the need for resuscitation (OR = 0.038), oxygen therapy (OR = 0.009), and shock (OR = 0.023), all with highly significant p-values (p < 0.001), indicating the severe initial compromise these neonates face.
The TNM staging system was an independent prognostic variable: stage I showed a median survival of 60.8 months, stage II of 31.7 months and stage III of 19.3 months, with highly significant differences in survival curves ( P =0.001) after excluding the single patient with a stage IV neoplasm ( Figure 3 ).
extremely significantqualified
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.
Factor loading coefficient analysis The analysis results of the factor loading coefficient table show that all measured variables have highly significant loadings on their corresponding latent variables ( P < 0.001), indicating that the scale has ideal convergent validity.
Furthermore, highly significant positive correlations were observed between the Cd content in pumpkin roots and stems ( p < 0.001), as well as between the Cd content in stems and leaves ( p < 0.001).
Among these, being male and practising restorative dentistry had a statistically highly significant association with satisfaction (p = 0.001) (Table 2 ).
Additionally, elevated MRproADM levels were associated with disease severity as displayed by highly significant correlations with the APACHE II score ( r = 0.333, p < 0.001), SOFA score ( r = 0.266, p < 0.001), or SAPS2 score ( r = 0.460, p < 0.001; Table 3 ).
Because of the significant age disparity, age-adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed and demonstrated that sweet and sour remained highly significant (p < 0.001), salty remained significant with a reduced effect size (p = 0.03), and bitter became borderline and no longer statistically significant (p = 0.06), indicating partial age confounding for bitter detection (Table 6 ; Figure 5 ).
On comparison of onset of sensory block, highly significant difference was found among groups ( P < 0.001), while no significant difference was found between Group 1 and 2.
Among these: Variants 5, 6, 7, 9, and 15 showed highly significant associations with disease severity ( p < 0.001).
approached significancep < 0.001
1B) than the speech of schizophrenia patients, although the latter comparison only approached significance (t (37) = -4.09, p < 0.001 and t (37) = -2.31, p = .08, respectively).
Additionally, all variances of similarities were highly significant and were increased in FEBD (all p values< .001).
There was a highly significant difference in median percentage weight loss both amongst different geographical regions ( P <0.001) and countries ( P <0.001).
Results WEB implanting induced highly significant rTTP prolongation by 52% ( p = 0.001) and highly significant decrease of aneurysmal inflow, outflow, and mean flow velocity ( p < 0.001).
BMI was statistically significant in Group I and the effect started at 4 th week ( P ≤ 0.05) and the differences in BMI reduction were highly significant at 16 th and 24 th weeks ( P ≤ 0.001).
Higher levels of lactate, PCT, NEWS, and LP-NEWS scores are associated with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, all highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Despite the low KMO, we proceeded with the exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis because Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 = 18,324, p < 0.001), indicating that there were non‐random correlations among at least some variables in our cohort.