Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relationship between neural slowing and amyloid-β burden was highly significant [ t (570037) = –61.97, P < 0.001], such that greater regional amyloid-β burden was associated with stronger oscillatory slowing across cortical regions, and this effect was greater in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease than those with aMCI [ t (570036) = −9.52, P < 0.001; Fig. 4 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In phase 1, the assumption of homogeneity of variances was breached (F = 10.094, p = 0.002), and the modified t -test revealed a highly significant disparity, t(66.547) = 4.256, p < 0.001, with a mean difference of 166.76 (95% CI: 88.53 to 244.98).
a decreasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Ethnic groups and occupational characteristics of RR-PTB The proportion of Han ethnic group was the largest but showed a decreasing trend ( P < 0.001), the proportion of Miao ethnic group ranked second and showed an increasing trend ( P < 0.05), and the proportion of Tujia ethnic group maintained ( P > 0.05) (Fig. 2 A).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Differential Expression of Moisture Stress-Responsive Genes The interaction effect of temperature, SMC, and time-points on different moisture stress-responsive genes was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) in both genotypes, but the interaction effect for NCED gene in the genotype JG 11 was only significant at 5% ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Several genes associated with specific phenolic acids: for instance, FxaYL_742g0962550 showed a highly significant correlation (*** p < 0.001) with 4-coumarate (also known as p-coumaric acid, which is high in FY, Figure 4 a), while the genes FxaYL_612g0137540 and FxaYL_341g0295300 were both strongly linked (*** p < 0.001) to the levels of anthranilate and rosmarinate ( Figure 6 d).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, our explanatory test of associations between P1, P6 and G16 (active social avoidance) revealed that G16 was highly significant positively correlated with P6 ( r = 0.413, p = 0.001), but not P1 after correction for multiplicity.