Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Chi-square test revealed significant ( p = 0.001*) and highly significant ( p < 0.001**) differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding the categories “staging” and “grading” in all compared groups when using the diagnostic algorithms (Table 4 ).
a decreasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Although SFC showed a decreasing trend over time at all three time points, numbers remained higher than for the PBS group ( p < 0.001, p = 0.0059 and p < 0.001, Figure 3 A) and the non-adjuvanted gE experimental vaccine group ( p = 0.0009, p = 0.0457, and p = 0.0008, Figure 3 A) at the same time point.
extremely significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualified
Compared with the UVA‐exposed control group, the content and relative expression of Nrf2 in the nucleus and cytoplasm of FDOP‐treated HSF cells have extremely significant differences ( p < .001); in addition, the content and relative expression of the Keap1 protein also showed highly significant differences ( p < .001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our results showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) association and a positive genetic correlation between resilience traits derived from body weight deviations (lnvar weight , lnvar standardized and lnMSE weight ) and tail biting wounds, lameness and mortality, although standard errors of genetic correlations were high.