RM-ANOVA showed a decreasing trend of the groin, leg, and back pain in the EG in the second to sixth hours after the trial (P < 0.001 for each area of pain measured), while in the CG groin, leg and back pain had an increasing trend (P < 0.001 for each area of pain measured) (Fig. 2 , 3 , 4 ).
Excerpts
Our main results demonstrated a highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) between mcAT and emAT data.
Moreover, a highly significant difference in seedling dry weight was observed among the treatments (p ≤ 0.001;*).
The difference in frequency of employment status in past and present were cross tabulated and difference compared using Chi-square test and found statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Ramla and Bene Beraq had 25% and 24% higher mortality, Bat Yam (15%) and Jerusalem (8%), all highly significant ( p value < 0.001).
The association of physical and psychosocial domains with the presence of chronic illness was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Group differences in change in knowledge across researcher/practitioner category were also highly significant (H = 27.87, p < 0.001), with emerging researchers/practitioners reporting the greatest change (mean rank = 175.70) and core researchers reporting the lowest change (102.17).
Both groups exhibited a highly significant difference when compared with group I (ANOVA, F (2, 21) = 48.77, P = 0.001) (Fig. 4 ).
Efficacy There was a significant trend for rapid lowering of HCV viral load in both groups (SOF + RBV and Catvira) versus their baseline ( p < 0.001).
Similarly, patients with TT genotype of rs2856973:T > A had higher CD4 + T cell counts statistically highly significant in the 3rd month ( p = 0.001).
Using Spearman's rho, the correlations between self-reported cock- roach sightings and allergen levels in dust samples were highly significant for both bed- room (r = 0.522, p < 0.001) and kitchen (r = 0.663, p < 0.001).
6 , and the correlation between them was weak but highly significant (Spearman’s rho = 0.39; p < 0.001).
There is a clear trend of decreasing the expression levels of the BDNF gene in the ovariectomized rats compared to the sham group ( P <0.001).
Compared to the wheat flour sample without flaxseed addition, highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) were noticed in relation to dough development time (DT) values.
Three reviews specifically on Baduanjin reported highly significant improvements (all p < 0.001) [ 31 , 33 , 42 ].
Similarly, in people aged 60 years or older, there was a highly significant difference in incidences between the rural and urban areas ( P < 0.001, OR = 2.41; CI 95 [1.8; 3.2]) (Table 3 ).
Across the different RC subgroups, there was an increasing trend in maximum cIMT ( P < 0.001) as RC levels increased within quartiles.
Highly significant Spearman's correlation was found between the two repeated individual forehead temperature measurements ( r =0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.84; P <0.001), whilst delta forehead temperature ([5 min °C] – [entrance °C]) was not associated with sex ( r =-0.21, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.03; P =0.092), age ( r =-0.06, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.18; P =0.612), hat/headgear use ( r =0.09, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.32; P =0.495) or reported time outside before temperature measurement ( r =-0.08, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.17; P =0.541).
These associations detected between the decreasing IPL thickness (or IPL density) and the worsening of local visual field sensitivity scores were highly significant (P<0.001 for both IPL thickness and density).
Therefore, a statistically highly significant and positive correlation found between the initial test and the re-test results in the test-re-test reliability analysis of the scale ( r = 0.99; P < 0.001). 3.4 Validity findings of the scale The findings regarding the content validity have been explained in the section titled development process. 3.4.1 Criterion validity The “Attitudes toward diabetes scale” (ATDS), which is a subgroup of the “Diabetes Care Profile” (DCP) scale, was used in order to evaluate the criterion validity of patient compliance with Type 2 DM treatment in the study.
Moreover, the Composite × Procedure interaction was highly significant (Wald χ2 = 41.428; df = 2; p < 0.001), demonstrating that the extent of color change induced by the procedures differed according to material type rather than affecting all composites uniformly.
There was a highly significant increase in the prevalence of ODH from baseline to both follow-up point (x 2 test p < 0.001).
The mean difference was 7.7 ± 4.5 million/mL, and the result was highly significant (p < 0.001, paired t-test) (Table 2 ).
Of these, two Austrian populations from “Obere Halbjochlacke” (OHJ, 74 clones) and “Runde Lacke” (RL, 29 clones) show highly significant intrapopulation variation (OHJ: ANOVA F 52, 194 = 112, P < 0.001; RL: F 28, 84 = 23.14, P < 0.001).
Genotype and Environmental Variance The analysis of variance showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) of genotype, environment, and environment by genotype interaction on grain yield, Fe, and Zn under both N conditions across environments ( Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 ). 2.2.