The figure shows a significant trend of reported experience of violence from the lowest total symptom score to the highest (χ 2 (3, N = 656) = 27.0, p < 0.001 for phase I and χ 2 (3, N = 656) = 38.9, p < 0.001 for phase III).
Excerpts
In Mélapleu, schools were cited as the most important source of information (62%), with a statistically highly significant difference to Zouatta II (18%; χ 2 = 13.4, P <0.001).
However, the evolution with time revealed a very highly significant linear increase ( p < 0.001).
However, variance components associated with the linear change over time were highly significant for both, sCort ( σ 1 2 = 0.0003, p < .001) and sAA ( σ 1 2 = 0.00004, p < .001), signifying that there is still high interindividual variation in change trajectories.
A highly significant main effect of treatment was also observed (F 4,186 = 8.40, p < 0.001), indicating that mT concentration strongly influenced shoot proliferation.
The statistical significance level was established as p ≤ 0.05 as significant, p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant, and p ≤ 0.001 as most significant. 3.
In particular, we found a negative trend of association of Ki67 with the proliferation index (P < 0.001).
Among the n-6 PUFA, statistically significant differences ( P <0.01) were observed for linoleic fatty acid and ∑n-6 PUFA, and highly significant differences ( P <0.001) were observed for γ -linolenic (C18:3 n-6) and arachidonic fatty acids.
The increase was highly significant (*** p < 0.001) compared to day 0.
Based on the p -values, the significance of model terms was classified as follows: non-significant ( p > 0.05), significant (0.05 > p > 0.01), highly significant (0.01 > p > 0.001), and remarkably significant (0.001 > p ).
Mixed-Effect Analysis Mixed-effects modeling ( Table 4 ) of individual leaf characteristics revealed highly significant baseline levels for the considered variables (intercept p < 0.001), with notable values for intercellular space (271.19) and SLA (101.35), which do indicate leaf developmental stage.
The differences in average performance between the three types of HPDs (passive earplug, active earplug and active earmuff) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whatever the comparisons (passive earplug vs. active earplug, passive earplug vs. active earmuff and active earplug vs. active earmuff).
The difference was highly significant (χ 2 = 53.05, p < 0.001).
There were highly significant, negative correlations between in-body and out-of-body experiences ( r 49 between −0.53 and −0.64, all p < 0.001 for each condition; r 49 = −0.63, p < 0.001 across conditions).
Differences were regarded as statistically significant and as statistically highly significant if p values were <0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively.
The differences were highly significant (observers 1, 2 and 3: P = 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively).
Patients with Mild COVID-19 infection associated with good OS as compared to patients with Moderate and Severe COVID-19 infected patients with a highly significant p = 0.001.
A significant trend of declining S-antibody levels was seen with time for both ChAdOx1 (p<0·001) and BNT162b2 (p<0·001; figure ; appendix ), with levels reducing by about five-fold for ChAdOx1, and by about two-fold for BNT162b2, between 21–41 days and 70 days or more after the second dose.
Differences between each group were assessed by Student’s t -test, while * p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 was highly significant, and *** p < 0.001 was strongly significant.
Notably, C i exhibited negative correlations with all measured indicators ( r = −0.740 to −0.229), which are significant for Chla, Chlb, and TChl ( p < 0.05), and highly significant for Tr and SSC ( p < 0.001).
There was a significant trend difference between the intervention and control populations in all forms quarterly TB notification rates (1.007, 95%CI 1.003–1.011, p = 0.001), as well as significant level change difference (1.036, 95% CI 1.014–1.059, p = 0.001).
All variables in the model were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
griseus (sp22) showed highly significant nonlinear relationships with soil total nitrogen (TN) and soil water content (W) ( p < 0.001), while no significant relationships were found with other soil factors including AHN and C/N ( p > 0.05) ( Figure 9 a–d and Figure A1 ).
In Saudi females, six equations (hand and finger measurements) were all highly significant ( p < 0.001), with R values from 0.593 to 0.904.
In contrast, methylated breast cancer specimens exhibited a highly significant (P < 0.001) loss of ID4 expression (median fold change = 12.3).