Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

3,741 sentences · 3,741 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
A random effect multinomial logit panel data model showed there was a significant trend over time ( p = 0.006 for the new onset of AF and VP and p = 0.01 for new BBB or IVCD) in the development of cardiac arrhythmias and ventricular conduction abnormalities ( Table 2 ).
An electrophysiological substrate of COVID-19.
J Electrocardiol · 2023 · PMC10027233
a significant trendp = 0.00670.1× alphagold
Similarly, when examining the yearly occurrence of OPSCC in males, we found a significant trend for both p16 positive cases (Spearman r = 0.9286, p = 0.0067; linear regression R 2 = 0.8675, p = 0.0023) and p16 negative cases (Spearman r = 0.8469, p = 0.0238; linear regression R 2 = 0.7591, p = 0.01) (Fig. 1 C).
a significant trendp = 0.0070.1× alphagold
Specifically, lower albumin levels were associated with an increased likelihood of being in the Moderate Progression group (missing data exclusion: OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99, p = 0.025; 10-year follow-up: OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99, p = 0.016) and a significant trend towards decreased likelihood in the Rapid Progression group (missing data exclusion: OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.96, p = 0.007; 10-year follow-up: OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98, p = 0.022) compared to the Slow Progression group.
a significant trendP = .0080.2× alphagold
When the prevalence of asthma was estimated only among patients with COVID-19 ( Table 2 ), a significant trend was observed, both in children and adults, with decreases in the asthma prevalence rates in waves II (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; P = .008; OR, 0.73; P < .001, respectively), III (OR, 0.62; P < .001; OR, 0.58; P < .001, respectively), IV (OR, 0.68; P < .001; OR, 0.70; P < .001, respectively) and V (OR, 0.53; P < .001; OR, 0.62; P < .001, respectively) compared with those in wave I ( Table 2 ).
a significant trendp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
In the higher quartiles of blood cadmium, there were significantly higher proportions of females, those with high school or equivalent education, those with lower household incomes, current smokers, and stroke patients. Blood cadmium concentration and stroke As shown in Table 2 , in the most adjusted model, participants in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 had an OR for stroke compared with the lowest reference group for blood cadmium in the total population, with OR of 1.32 (95% CI 0.55–3.14), 1.65 (95% CI 0.71–3.83), and 2.67 (95% CI 1.10–6.49), respectively, with a significant trend (p = 0.008).