Ca 19.9, at the cut-off >78 U/ml, indicated a significant trend to predict the need for VR (sensitivity 67%, specificity 53%; p = 0.059).
← all phrases
“a significant trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
CAA-SVD scores showed a significant increase ( p = 0.02) for Group A and a significant trend ( p = 0.059) for Group B.
C|C genotype inversely predicted the HTR group membership with a significant trend (OR = 0.333; B = −1.1; p = 0.059) Furthermore, the DRD2 rs1799732 I|I vs.
For PCF a significant trend was observed, achieving Rho=0.383 (P=0.059).
A significant trend was also observed for T3 ( P =0.06).
The mean ± standard deviation for the minimum variation was 0.39 ± 0.86 mm (95% CI, − 0.33 mm to 1.11 mm) for the test tablet intake and 0.17 ± 0.18 mm (95% CI, 0.02 mm to 0.32 mm) for the control tablet intake, with a significant trend between two groups for the trial tablet ( p = 0.06), order ( p = 0.15), and phase factors ( p = 0.07).
Being divorced/widowed was also associated with a higher BMI (OR: 1.177; 95% CI: 1.036–1.336; p =0.012), whereas only a significant trend was seen in the association between being retired and a higher BMI ( p =0.060) ( Table 1 ).
In this study, there was a significant trend to decrease the VE•VCO 2 −1 slope after BJ intake compared with the PL ( p = 0.06) during both routines although the VE•VCO 2 −1 slope only declined significantly with a rest between exercises coinciding with improvements in FS performance (first routine).
Moreover, a significant trend with moderate effect size was found between JS and C (mean percentage difference: 4.8 ± 5.4%, p = 0.060, g = 0.469, 95% CI: Lower = −8.980, Upper = 0.250).
Inter-group analysis showed a significant difference in vitamin D ( P = .03) at T0 and a significant trend in neuropsychological variables as MADRS at T1 ( P = .06).
At 93 days of age, G2 had a numerically higher S/ P value than the other groups with a significant trend compared to G1 and G3 ( p = 0.06).
Moreover, a significant trend was found for alcohol use and the Technological Anxiety/Dependence subscale ( P =.06; R 2 =0.02).
Intergroups analysis showed a significant trend between two groups at T0 in MFV-ICA ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ). 3.3.
Analysis revealed no interactions for happiness, but a significant trend for an interaction of the factors congruence x DBS for disgust [F(1,13) = 4.19; p = 0.06] ( Figure 3 a).
We also observed a significant trend in the interaction between incivility and moral disengagement ( F (2,411) = 2.82, p = .06, η p 2 = .014).
We defined a significant trend as p < 0.06.
Type 2 was significantly associated with longer operation time ( p < 0.01) and showed a significant trend toward greater intraoperative blood loss ( p = 0.06).
When adjusted by MDA treatment year ( Figure 5 ), a plateau is observed during years 5–8, resulting in an inability to demonstrate a significant trend over the period (p = 0.06).
Repeated-measures ANOVA identified a significant trend for the effect of time ( P = 0·06) but not any treatment or time × treatment effects on faecal bifidobacteria levels ( Fig. 3 ).
The cluster-value showed a significant trend in the probability distribution between esto and ésta ( p = 0.06).
Furthermore, by conducting a Fisher's exact test, a significant trend was found when the paltering technique is used by a human and an anime face ( p = 0.06).
Thus, a significant trend was found between the presence of a chronic inflammatory pattern and diarrhea ( p = 0.060).
The variant rs150665432 showed a significant trend ( P = 0.06) in the much smaller replication dataset.
There were significant differences between the mean duration of sniffing in the naïve to VPS and naïve to Sal ( p < 0.05) conditions, and a significant trend between naïve to VPS and other conditions (Sal to naïve: p = 0.06; VPA to naïve: p = 0.07). 4 Discussion This study examined social attention behavior toward conspecifics, an aspect of sociability not measured in the three-chamber test.
However, we found a significant trend for years of education and memory change for the Rx2 group ( S1 Fig , r = 0.51 p = 0.06) but not for the NR and R groups (r = 0.22 p = 0.43, r = 0.28 p = 0.33, respectively).