Barely Significant
← all phrases

a slight trend

1,602 sentences · 1,602 papers · 4,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Regarding PA, as in previous studies [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], at the end of the intervention, there were no differences in PA levels between the groups, although both showed a slight trend towards improvement; this was in line with the improvement trends found in both groups in terms of motivation towards PA (external motivation and amotivation).
Statistical analysis of inaccuracy and bias in each method has a substantial contribution to the debate concerning the importance and limits of different age estimation methods; in our study, the dental and skeletal methods showed an excellent correlation with real age, especially under 2 years: in this age range, indeed inaccuracy from all the methods is similar, with a slight trend to underestimation.
Time-to-first subsequent exacerbation did not differ significantly according to the timing of treatment initiation, though a slight trend towards longer median time-to-first moderate exacerbation could be observed among prompt vs. delayed initiators (Fig. 4 ).
In line with the short-term real-life study, as well as the approval and follow-up trials [ 6 , 15 , 16 ], the ER-formulation in our study was comparable to the IR-formulation in maintaining the WBC cystine levels in patients with cystinosis, with a slight trend towards a lower percent of cystine levels < 1 nmol during the ER-treatment.
Between 2004 and 2019, there was no substantial inequality in smoking prevalence by remoteness, a relatively stable inequality by education, but a slight trend for increasing absolute and relative inequalities by area-level disadvantage (for the middle disadvantage subgroup, a prevalence difference of 4.3 percentage points [95% CI: 1.3–7.4] in 2004 to 8.0 percentage points [95% CI: 5.5–10.5] in 2019, and a prevalence ratio of 1.2 [95% CI: 1.0–1.4] in 2004 to 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4–2.3] in 2019; for the most disadvantaged subgroup, a prevalence difference of 7.5 percentage points [95% CI: 3.9–11.2] in 2004 to 16.8 percentage points [95% CI: 12.7–20.8] in 2019, and a prevalence ratio of 1.4 [95% CI: 1.2–1.7] in 2004 to 2.8 [95% CI: 2.1–3.5] in 2019).
6 B) with a slight trend for elevation with Asn909Lys and also Ile703Val at baseline and in the presence of reducing substrate confirming a general trend for increase with all of the mutations despite clear differences in the O 2 ·- generating activities of these mutations ( Fig. 6 C and D).