Barely Significant
← all phrases

a statistical trend

2,799 sentences · 2,799 papers · 4,678 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) estimate of overall sur- vivalfor chordoma patients according to site oftumor. Pathological features such as ploidy were reported to show a statistical trend for prognostic significance in chordoma patients.3 Also, chondroid chordoma subtype is known to carry a better prognosis.16 None of the cases reported here was described as chon- droid chordoma.
However, there was a statistical trend toward higher frequency and MFI in CD3 + TILs expressing ICs in CMS1 (containing mainly MSI tumors) versus the other subgroups (significant for Tim-3 (Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, p = 0.0382) and TIGIT (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.0446)) ( Figure S3A,B ).
Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that low levels of CRP (<8 mg/L, hazard ratio 4.687 (95% CI 1.144–19.199, p= 0.032) were significantly associated with a prolonged transplant-free survival whereas higher age (≥35 years, hazard ratio 0.488 (95% CI 0.23–1.038), p = 0.062) showed a statistical trend for shorter transplant-free survival in patients with SSC-CIP ( Table 3 ).
48 – 50 A recent systematic review 51 indicated that multiple HVLA thrusts delivered over several treatment sessions resulted in a statistical trend towards improving pain pressure scores and self-report levels of pain. 52 Further, a single treatment session, which involved multiple osteopathic and manipulative techniques, immediately reduced self-reported pain relative to a control group in patients with acute LAS. 53 Similarly, studies that used multiple manipulative techniques 54 , 55 delivered over several treatment sessions reported significant improvements in pain outcome measures.
offer for these contentions is the finding of a statistical trend towards women in relationships showing a stronger attraction to masculine faces during fertile phases than during nonfertile phases—an effect that was weaker in women who were not in relationships.