Barely Significant
← all phrases

almost significant

1,012 sentences · 1,012 papers · 2,294 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

All the three models showed significant or at least almost significant associations between the three measures of academic achievement, again indicating support to the reciprocal relationships between importance of good grades and educational achievement as suggested in our conceptual framework.
Although no main effect was found for the product factor, the presence of an almost significant interaction between product and match week, combined with the descriptively progressive increase observed in the NIT + CM group, may point to a more favorable adjustment in this group over time.
Interestingly, the COMT val allele yielded an almost significant result for males in the Cheuk and Wong meta-analysis. 53 Thus, it could potentially be involved in male susceptibility to ADHD. 53 There is however consistent evidence that the COMT val/val genotype is associated with CD symptoms in those with ADHD. 54 Since the first report, the same genotype was
On the other hand, the difference of -18 ms ( p = 0.313) obtained for control muscles in four of five RG1 rats and the difference of 1 ms ( p = 1.0) for control muscles in the RG2 rats was not significant, while the difference of -21 ms ( p = 0.026) obtained for muscles with SNC in the RG2 rats was almost significant ( S8 and S9 Tables).
The difference in odds ratios for mild versus severe cognitive deficiency was not statistically significant for parents’ socio-economic status and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (p-value for heterogeneity in odds ratios = 0.4 and 0.2, respectively) but was almost significant for cerebral lesions and number of siblings (p-value for heterogeneity in odds ratios = 0.08 and 0.1, respectively) and significant for gestational age of 28 weeks or less and small for gestational age (p-value for heterogeneity in odds ratios = 0.01 and 0.007, respectively).
From the best synchrony model (model 6; Table S4 ), the geometric mean lambda for Antarctic fur seals was estimated as 0.984 [0.974, 0.995], equivalent to an annual decline of 2% since 1985; and for southern elephant seals, the geometric mean lambda was estimated as 0.993 [0.985, 1.001], equivalent to an almost significant annual decline of 1%.