Barely Significant
← all phrases

almost significant

333 sentences · 333 papers · 2,294 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Expression of MDL1 and MDL1AS in LARC Patients Predict 5-Year Survival Given the differential expression of MDL1AS between rectal cancer cells and the surrounding normal tissue ( Figure 1 A) and that the differences in levels of expression for this lncRNA were almost significant in patients with long survival when compared to those with lower survival ( p = 0.053, Table 1 ), we decided to study more deeply the connections between the expression of MDL1/MDL1AS and LARC patient survival.
almost significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
There was a significant difference between the follow‐ups before the intervention on the one hand and after 1 week and 9 months on the other hand for the three groups ( p > 0.05), except for the comparison between T 0 and T 4 in the RM‐GIC group, where the difference was almost significant ( p = 0.053).
almost significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Table 3 demonstrates differences with respect to radiological findings. Correlation between tumor volume and NPI A secondary analysis investigated the relationship between tumor volume and NPI values, revealing an almost significant negative correlation (rs = −0.7; p = 0.054), indicating that larger tumor volumes tended to be associated with lower NPI scores.
almost significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
However, no significant differences were found in the brush border integrity; degree of supranuclear vacuolization in enterocytes; enterocyte nuclei position; enterocyte height; height of villi; width of the submucosa, muscular, and serosa layers or goblet cell density, although the reduction in the goblet cell density in fish fed VM (from 29.36 ± 2.08 to 25.75 ± 2.19) was almost significant ( Figure 2 c,d; Student’s t -test: p = 0.054).
almost significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
This difference was driven by a sex-dependent effect of trauma exposure, which was associated with an increase of MECP2 expression selectively in men ( p = 0.009 for non-traumatized vs traumatized men after post hoc comparisons on an almost significant sex*trauma interaction: F 1,124 = 3.79, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.03; Fig. 1A ) without affecting women.