Barely Significant
← all phrases

almost significant

376 sentences · 376 papers · 2,294 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
This difference was driven by a sex-dependent effect of trauma exposure, which was associated with an increase of MECP2 expression selectively in men ( p = 0.009 for non-traumatized vs traumatized men after post hoc comparisons on an almost significant sex*trauma interaction: F 1,124 = 3.79, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.03; Fig. 1A ) without affecting women.
almost significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
To account for the reduced power, and considering the consistent non‐significant results for any interaction factor, we repeated the analysis including only main effects and, consistently with the previous results, we observed a main effect for treatment ( F (39) = 4.47, p = 0.043) and separation ( F (39) = 7.64, p = 0.010), but only an almost significant trend for testing day ( F (39) = 3.965, p = 0.056).
almost significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Based on MyPlate guidelines, in general, for “Pattern I ”, the participant in Q4 had a significantly higher intake of grain (6.38 ± 0.21oz-e; p < 0.001), dairy (0.43 ± 0.02c; p < 0.001), protein (8.35 ± 0.25oz-e; p < 0.001), and it was almost significant for vegetables (0.77 ± 0.04c; p = 0.056) in comparison to Q1 participants (grain = 4.56 ± 0.19 oz-e; dairy = 0.24 ± 0.03c; vegetables = 0.62 ± 0.05c; and protein = 3.05 ± 0.15 oz-e).
almost significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Regarding the first assessment questionnaire, in response to the question “Do you consider that you have a healthy diet?”, there were statistically significant differences with the physical dimension score (rho = 0.197, p = 0.047) and the energy/fatigue health concept (rho = 0.210, p = 0.034), and almost significant differences with the total SF-36 score (rho = 0.19, p = 0.057). 3.3.3.
almost significantp =0.0571.1× alphagold
For N2 latency, the results revealed an almost significant difference between groups [ F (2,23)=3.26, p =0.057] and, importantly, that the two-fold group×electrode interaction reached significance [ F (4,46)=5.70, p =0.001.
almost significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
An almost significant between-subject effect was found for Clarity, F (1,15) = 4.265, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.221, and a significant effect for Engagement, F (1,15) = 4.957, p = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.248, and Gender, F (1,15) = 9.521, p = 0.008, η p 2 = 0.388, females have higher RR, while participants with higher RR have higher Engagement but possibly lower Clarity.
almost significantp value = 0.05751.1× alphagold
The Tajima’s D test detected significant deviations from neutrality in Og -1 and Og -2 (Mean D = − 2.01, p value = 0.0010), almost significant deviation in Osj -1 and Osj -2 (Mean D = − 1.29, p value = 0.0575), and non-significant deviation in Osi -1 and Osi -2 (Additional file 5 : Table S3).