For chronic back pain, none of the personality traits were significant predictors of social exclusion, however, extraversion approached significance ( B = −0.213, p < 0.051) with greater levels of extraversion being associated with less willingness to interact.
We did, however, find a three-way interaction between gender, education, and the explanation satisfaction manipulation on measured explanation satisfaction that approached significance ( p = 0.051), which provides some potential support for the gender-by-education interaction presented in Study 2.
Improvement on the pain subscale with an increase of 10.7 points from baseline to 12th cycle, approached significance ( p = 0.051, n = 21).
There was also a cluster that approached significance in the left thalamus (p = 0.051), indicating local deflation (Supplementary Table S3 ).
Younger patients (< 60 years) showed a non-significant trend toward higher risk (HR = 1.677, p = 0.087), whereas those ≥ 60 years approached significance (HR = 1.394, p = 0.051), though age interaction was non-significant ( p = 0.544).
In comparison, the shift in SEF only approached significance (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.051) (Supplementary Fig. 5c ).
i) Control group: A negative correlation between LV-GLS and LV-CO ( r = 0.55, p = 0.032) was present and the correlation of LV-GLS and MCA-PI z-score approached significance ( r = 0.48, p = 0.051).
However, the difference between physician similarity scores approached significance ( P = .051), suggesting a trend toward reduced simulation accuracy and aesthetic outcomes in revision cases ( Supplemental Table 1 ).
Conscientiousness predicted connectedness to self ( F (1, 368) = 5.67, p = 0.018, η 2 = 0.012) and approached significance for connectedness to world/spirituality ( F (1, 368) = 3.85, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.008).
4532 pg/ml, p = 0.016), and NfL levels in MV2K approached significance when compared to MM/MV1 (7892 vs. 4532 pg/ml, p = 0.051).
The average anaerobic power approached significance (p = 0.051, pη 2 = 0.162), but was not significantly different between the groups.
The Hypertension × Condition interaction approached significance ( p = 0.051).
While none of the interactions reached significance, the task × route part interaction approached significance, F (1, 105) = 3.89, p = .051, η p 2 = .036.
These associations became non-significant after adjustment for age and BMI, with the exception of FAI which approached significance ( P = 0.051), suggesting that FAI——reflecting bioactive circulating androgens—might exhibit greater sensitivity than TT in indicating MAP variations.
A 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed that the revaluation group × distractor-type interaction approached significance, F (1,55) = 3.97, p = .051, η p 2 = .07 [0, .19], with a trend towards a greater difference in capture by high-training versus low-training distractors in the NoRev group than the Rev group ( Figure 6d ).
The difference between HC and PR approached significance ( p = 0.051, t = 2.566) but did not reach the threshold.
The difference in engaging in more preventative behaviors between those in Profile 4 and Profile 3 approached significance ( M diff = 0.49, p = .051).
For leucine AUC, a significant treatment effect was found ( p < 0.001), while the time effect approached significance ( p = 0.051).
Although MOCA score approached significance ( p = 0.051), the differences between Subgroups 3 and 4 were not statistically significant.
Consumption of tea approached significance ( P =.051), while consumption of coffee, cheese, and wine were not significant.
At T2, CRP levels approached significance ( P = 0.051), with higher median levels in the MACE group (30.5) compared to the control group (13.4) (Table 2 ).
In the environmental domain, quality-of-life scores were significantly lower for the severe group compared with moderate cases ( p = 0.007), whereas the mild–moderate difference approached significance ( p = 0.051).
Although the interaction term approached significance ( b nFit x PSQI = −0.05, SE ( b nFit x PSQI ) = 0.026, t (27) = −2.05, p = 0.051), the adjusted R 2 marginally improved from 67% to 70% ( F (3,26) = 23.74, p < 0.0001; n = 30) and the nFit and PSQI estimates and results were nearly identical to those in the second regression ( b nFit = 0.021, SE ( b nFit ) = 0.003, t (26) = 6.90, p < 0.0001; b PSQI = 0.102, SE ( b PSQI ) = 0.029, t (26) = 3.57, p = 0.001).
The mean dose to the mandible also approached significance (HR = 1.06, p = 0.0511), suggesting a potential dose-response relationship (Table 2 ).
For SNF%, the overall effect approached significance ( p = 0.0512).