Barely Significant
← all phrases

approaching significance

2,199 sentences · 2,199 papers · 3,313 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significancep = 0.1052.1× alphagold
All significant results above were detected here too (i.e., main effect of Time perspective, differences between past and future trials, and group comparison on distant future), but the main effect of Condition was only approaching significance, F (1, 33.01) = 2.78, p = 0.105 (all other comparisons, p > 0.05 as reported above; see Supplementary Table 4 for full details).
approaching significancep = 0.11142.2× alphagold
In the current application, the TDT data were approaching significance for HLA - C1 k and the 2DL2 and 2DS2 genes (p = 0.1114, and p = 0.2026, respectively); however, only 49% of the parents were informative for HLA - C group transmission as much of the data could not be used due to allelic homozygosity.
approaching significanceP =.122.4× alphagold
Other comparisons approaching significance ( P =.12) were found in older adults without reported health conditions versus older adults with reported health conditions and in 1 session versus >10 sessions, with the same studies [ 33 , 35-38 , undefined , undefined , undefined ] included in each subgroup for the number of sessions.
approaching significancep = 0.1342.7× alphagold
The relationship began approaching significance between the second and third inflection points (1.24 to 2.91 ng/mL) [-0.238 (-0.555, 0.079); p = 0.134], ultimately achieving significance following the third inflection point (ln-transformed cotinine ≥ 2.91 ng/mL), with a significant decrease in ln-transformed RBC folate levels [-0.198 (-0.303, -0.093); p = 0.002].
approaching significanceP = 0.13552.7× alphagold
A borderline association approaching significance was observed among individuals diagnosed with AF (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.15, P = 0.1355), implying a possible variation in the impact of RCII on stroke severity depending on AF status; however, statistical significance was not achieved in either the non-AF ( P = 0.5005) or AF group ( P = 0.1355) (Fig. 1 a).
approaching significanceP = .13892.8× alphagold
Both methods showed negative associations between CLIC5 and CP, with the weighted median method achieving statistical significance (beta = −0.1561, SE = 0.07822, P = .04593) and the weighted mode method approaching significance (beta = −0.1728, SE = 0.1096, P = .1389; Table 1 and Fig. 1 ). 3.5.