“borderline significant”

The MS spinal cord CSA was lower than control by between 19% and 24%, quite small proportional variation between cord levels; however, there was borderline significant evidence, P = 0.055, of variation in absolute differences by region, with the largest absolute loss in the cervical region (Figure 5 A). aCST was decreased in the MS spinal cord by between 25% and 37% (Table 2 ).

The final model for visual noise benefit was statistically significant, whereas the model with auditory noise benefit was only borderline significant (p = .055), and results for the auditory manipulation should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Prognostic Risk Factors In univariate Cox models of other prognostic risk factors, OS was positively associated with MGMT methylation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.490 [CI: 0.314–0.765], P = .002 [.005]) and borderline significant negatively associated with steroid use (HR 1.562 [CI: 0.991–2.463], P = .055 [.093]), but not with PS (HR 1.284 [CI: 0.841–1.959], P = .247 [.344]), age (HR 0.992 [CI: 0.969–1.107], P = .528 [.638]), an a priori diagnosis of progression (HR 1.304 [CI: 0.845–2.012], P = .230 [.332]), or prior biopsy only (HR 0.53 [CI: 0.263–1.062], P = .073 [.119]).

A borderline significant correlation was present between the up-regulation of expression and the stage of the disease (p=0.055).

In contrast, the relationship between parent-rated emotionality for happiness and pupil dilation to happy faces was only borderline significant after removing these participants, χ 2 = 3.69, p = .055, b = 0.10, SE = 0.051.

In the delay-discounting task (0–45 s), PFOS (vs vehicle) was associated with a borderline significant lower percentage of choices for the large reward (mean difference = −9.4 %age points, 95 % CI −19.1–0.26, p = 0.055) and was associated with more omissions (mean difference = 4.3 points, 95 % CI 0.50–8.07, p = 0.031).

SP+PP) were more frequently CCSVI-positive, the difference reaching statistical significance in Centres 3 and 4 (a borderline significant difference, p = 0.055, was also found in Centre 2).

Calculation of AUC values indicated that only hs-cTnI levels at 12 hours had significant discriminatory ability (P = 0.013), although CK-MB levels at 12 hours were borderline significant (P = 0.055).

In this cohort of 115 patients, the association between higher BED10 and better LC was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

The difference in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

We found that uncorrectable VI—caused by pathological conditions—was associated with a significant reduction in health utility, as measured by the TTO instrument (disutility of 0.052, p = 0.041), and a borderline significant reduction when measured by the EQ-5D-5 L (disutility of 0.047, p = 0.055), after adjustment for socio-demographic factors and chronic disease history.

9 There was also a borderline significant increase in standing arterial pressure after 10 weeks of supplementation with corn oil compared with baseline (+2.00 mm Hg, p=0.055).

When symbolic responses from the two Single conditions were summed and compared to these responses from the two Multiple conditions, a paired t -test revealed a borderline significant difference, t (15) = 2.1, p = 0.055, d = 0.42 (Multiple > Single).

These findings were confirmed in univariate Cox regression analysis using a dichotomised variable of low (0–2) and high (3–4) PODXL expression (HR=1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–2.84, P <0.001 for CSS and HR=1.85; 95% CI 1.29–2.64, P =0.001 for 5-year OS), and remained significant for 5-year OS in multivariate analysis (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.03–2.25, P <0.036) and borderline significant for CSS (HR=1.57; 95% CI 0.99–2.18, P =0.055), adjusted for age, gender, TNM status, differentiation grade and vascular invasion ( Table 2 ).

Their mean (SD) SSS-score was higher, 39.8 (16.5) points, which was borderline significant, P = 0.055.

There was no significant deterioration in fit when A was dropped from the ADE model (p = 0.740, AIC −1.890) whereas reducing an ACE to a CE model resulted in a borderline significant deterioration in fit (p = 0.055, AIC 1.669).

An association with HIV transmission risk was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

The associations of venous ectasia, venous lakes and arteriovenous microshunts with occurrence of complications was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

Marital status showed that unmarried individuals had increased odds (OR 1.785, 95% CI 0.988 to 3.222), but the association was borderline significant (p=0.055).

No statistical differences were identified between groups, except for a borderline significant difference in baseline plasma glucose (lower in group 2, p = 0.055).

Weekly MVPA time (≥150 minutes versus <150 minutes) exhibited a borderline significant inverse association with low handgrip strength (OR = 0.395, p = .055).

This difference is borderline significant (P=0.055).

Interestingly, the bodily pain domain showed borderline significant ( p = 0.055) reduction of pain score at second year of treatment.

For some of these SNPs (in the ZFAND6, ADYC5, IGF2BP2, SLC30A8, KLHDC5, and HMGA2 genes), statistically significant or borderline significant interactions with BMI (or with waist circumference) in determining T2D were reported in the EPIC-InterAct study ( p = 0.055, p < 0.01; p = 0.034; p = 0.099; p = 0.10, respectively) [ 16 ].

On the other hand, there was also a borderline significant association ( p = .055) between the pp53 Ser 392 labeling index and HSA stage, being higher in stage I than stage II (Fig. 5 d).