Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

3,468 sentences · 3,468 papers · 13,524 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The P4P was associated with an 8.4 percentage point increase in the availability of 37 medicines combined (P = 0.002) and an 8.3 percentage point increase in the availability of medical supplies, although this was borderline significant (P = 0.050) [ 13 ].
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In the unadjusted comparison of outcomes between the IMN and ORIF pairs, there were no statistically significant differences, although the greater prevalence of revisions in the ORIF cohort was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The difference for the 3 rd PDM gain of the ABP input was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), inviting some thoughts about its mechanism of origin (see Discussion). 4 Discussion The regulation of cerebral blood flow is achieved through intricate coordination of multiple homeostatic mechanisms driven by mechanical signaling (e.g., blood pressure variations) and/or chemical signaling (e.g., blood gas variations) occurring systemically throughout the cerebrovascular and autonomic nexus ( Willie et al., 2014 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).
borderline significantP =0.051.0× alphagold
Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).