“borderline significant”

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

Rigidity demonstrated a borderline significant improvement (ES: 0.62; p = 0.050), whereas bradykinesia showed no significant improvement (ES: 0.26; p = 0.416).

Results showed no significant relations between mothers’ prenatal socioeconomic or social support adversity and offspring’s parasympathetic nervous system trajectories, but there was a statistically significant relationship between social support adversity and offspring’s heart rate trajectories (p<.05) and a borderline significant relationship between socioeconomic adversity and offspring’s sympathetic nervous system trajectories (p = .05).

A borderline significant difference in survival was observed for patients with localised cancer stage ( p = 0.05).

A respectively significant and borderline significant decrease in FM was observed in the I (−4.04%, P < 0.05) and C (−3.66%, P = 0.05) group.

The associations with Roseburia , Alistipes , Faecalibacterium , and Staphylococcus remained borderline significant in sensitivity analyses for SES factors ( p > 0.05) (Table S13 ).

The multivariate analysis confirmed the effect of EGFR mutation and advanced nodal stage, which were strongly associated with brain metastases development, while age was borderline significant (p = 0.05).

Composition variation was also found among the HA subgroups (HA-1, HA-2, and HA-3), which was also not significant (all p > 0.05), with exceptions for Bacteroides uniformis and Mediterraneibacter gravus , which were borderline significant between HA-2 and HA-3 and between AD and HA-3 (both p = 0.05), respectively ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).

In addition, acupuncture provided borderline significant reduction in the WOMAC pain subscale (range 0–20) at the end of the treatment (MD − 1.2, 95%CI − 2.3 to 0.0, p = 0.05) and at 9 months (MD − 1.4, 95%CI − 2.7 to 0.0, p = 0.05) post-treatment.

There was a borderline significant strain×stress interaction for sessions (F1,41 = 4.07, P = .05), a main effect of strain on errors (F1,41 = 21.86, P <.01) and correction errors (F1,41 = 27.00, P <.01) to criterion ( Figure S3A–C ).

However, the DQI-I scores showed significant variation across BMI categories ( p = 0.019), with post-hoc analysis indicating a borderline significant difference between underweight and overweight participants ( p = 0.050).

The HRs for the continuous PRS were not significantly different between the BCFR and kConFab study cohorts (p=0.13) for study*PRS interaction, but were borderline significant for the upper vs. lower quintile (P=0.05), nor did the HR vary significantly as a function of age at baseline (p=0.88 and p=0.71 for the two cohorts, respectively).

For the MTRR A66G polymorphism, we detected a borderline significant interaction between this polymorphism and overweight/obesity on serum HDL-C levels ( P = 0.050, Table 3 ).

In addition, there was a borderline significant reduction in disease recurrence rate (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-1.0, p=0.05) [ 32 ].

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, ONS significantly increased body weight and improved nutritional status, while its effect on global QoL was borderline significant (MD +4.01, 95% CI: 0.08–7.94; p = 0.05).

Sex-specific linear regression analyses, while not reaching significance level of 0.05, indicated that the associations between As exposures and Alu, LINE-1 and LUMA were positive among male newborns (N = 58) but negative among female newborns (N = 43); tests for sex differences were borderline significant for the association of cbAs and mbAs with Alu (p = 0.05 and 0.09, respectively) and for the association between maternal uAs and LINE-1 (p = 0.07).

After further adjustment for age, only a smaller putamen volume fraction remained borderline significant with an OR of 0.699 ([95% CI 0.481, 0.987], p = 0.050). 3.3.

The data is borderline significant at p<0.05 for the difference between the median of 56 pairs of flies.

These differences in treatment effects were borderline significant (p = 0.05) (Fig. 3 E, F).

Despite substantial heterogeneity across studies ( I 2 = 80.0%, p < 0.00001), the pooled effect size indicated a borderline significant change in stress (SMD = 0.230, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.460, p = 0.050).

In the patient group, response times to addition sums that bridged a decade (M = 4431.18, SD = 4197.4) showed a borderline significant difference from those addition sums that did not bridge a decade (M = 3698.98, SD = 3765); standardized test statistic = −1.96, n = 9, p = 0.05.

With an ICP threshold of ≥22 mmHg, logistic regression yielded an OR of 2.8 (1.4; 5.7, p = .00) for ONSDext and a borderline significant OR of 3.2 (1.0; 10.3, p = .05) for ONSDint.

The treatment group effect remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

Subgroup Analyses Based on I2 and the p-value for heterogeneity, the progression of LGD to HGD or EAC showed borderline significant substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 66%; p = 0.05), LGD to HGD showed statistically insignificant low heterogeneity (I2 = 15%; p = 0.31), and LGD to EAC showed statistically insignificant moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 60%; p = 0.11).