“borderline significant”

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

Cell survival after treatment with 677C is not significantly different from cells treated with the control CT677 at concentrations of 100 and 200 n M ( P >0.05), and shows only small but borderline significant differences at 300 and 400 n M ( P =0.05 and P =0.04, respectively).

A meta-analysis confirmed that whey protein supplementation for at least four weeks reduced both waist circumference ( p = 0.03, I 2 : 77%, P heterogeneity : 0.00) and body fat mass ( p = 0.04, I 2 : 00.0%, P heterogeneity : 0.44) with statistical significance, followed by borderline significance in BMI decrement (statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.05, I 2 : 23%, P heterogeneity : 0.16)), while preserving lean body mass, since no statistically significant changes in lean body mass were observed between the pre-and post-intervention data.

Findings were borderline significant for the employed (MOR 1.4; CI: 1.0-2.0, p = 0.05) Table 3 .

Egger's tests were borderline significant ( P = 0.05) or statistically significant ( P = 0.03), respectively. discussion The present systematic literature review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies clearly supports that, in breast cancer survivors, higher BMI is consistently associated with lower overall and breast cancer survival, regardless of when BMI is ascertained.

[ 19 ] were nuanced: they reported no significant difference using weighted UniFrac but observed a borderline significant separation ( p = 0.05) with the unweighted UniFrac metric.

Those variables showing a significant or borderline significant (p ≤ 0.05) association with treatment outcomes on univariate analyses were also included in a multivariate analysis performed with the Cox proportional hazards model.

As compared to 300 m altitude, training at 1,900 m showed borderline significant differences in the pre-post mean reduction rates of triglyceride (p = 0.050) and leptin levels (p = 0.093).

However, within the combined FTLD cohort, the presence of any alteration in pain or temperature responsiveness was significantly associated with atrophy of right mid insula (and borderline significant also for right posterior insula) when thresholded at P < 0.05 FWE after correction within the prespecified anatomical region of interest; no significant grey matter associations were identified for pain symptoms or for temperature symptoms separately, at the prescribed threshold.

History of HTN had a borderline significant effect on the occurrence of MACE (HR: 1.295, 95% CI: 0.999, 1.677, p = 0.05).

For hamstrings, the pooled effect was smaller and borderline significant (SMD = 1.48 [− 0.01, 2.97], Z = 1.94, p = 0.05; I 2 = 81%), indicating variability across studies.

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

However, the sex interaction P -values were only borderline significant ( P = 0.05–0.11) due to lack of statistical power, except for AF-PRS post-PCI ( P = 0.003).

In interaction analyses, no strong overall evidence of multiplicative interaction between current BMI category and alcohol drinking frequency was observed (overall interaction p = 0.503; Supplementary Table S6 ), although one individual interaction term for BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 combined with alcohol frequency of 2 times/week was borderline significant (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.00–27.73; p = 0.050).

Improvement in work and social functioning was borderline significant (mean change −2.92, Hedges g = 0.28; P = 0.05).

ECMO is a known risk factor for in-hospital mortality [ 10 ], although in our cohort it remained borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

For UCDVA, a borderline significant correlation was observed with IOL decentration (r = 0.14, p = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.002–0.27), whereas tilt was not associated (r = 0.0006, p = 0.99).

There was a borderline significant difference in tumor size (P=0.05).

However, when the correction rate in the 2 groups was compared, it was borderline significant in the treatment group (p = 0.05).

Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).

Among these, 10 associations are borderline significant (0.1 < P-value < 0.05) and are included in the tables in support of other more significant associations.

When using weight gain between six and 12 months and BMI as continuous variables, the same pattern was seen, except for only a borderline significant association in the multivariable version (βeta ( β ) 0.048, (SE), 0.025, p = 0.05).

VAS-based appetite ratings did not show significant changes in hunger, fullness, or desire to eat, but a borderline significant reduction was observed in prospective food consumption after pelemir-enriched bread ( p = 0.050).

Results showed no significant relations between mothers’ prenatal socioeconomic or social support adversity and offspring’s parasympathetic nervous system trajectories, but there was a statistically significant relationship between social support adversity and offspring’s heart rate trajectories (p<.05) and a borderline significant relationship between socioeconomic adversity and offspring’s sympathetic nervous system trajectories (p = .05).

ADAE prediction generalizability Overall, there was no significant association between the ADAE prediction performance and the patient age ( p = 0.104), skin type ( p = 0.587; excluding unknown skin types, and skin types V + VI due to low sample size (<25)), or lesion location domain ( p = 0.233; excluding lesions in unknown locations, and oral/genital lesions due to low sample size (<25)), the technical domain (i.e., camera setup; p = 0.068) or the dermatologists’ diagnostic confidence score, although borderline significant ( p = 0.050).