“borderline significant”

There was a significant difference in the pre- and postoperative changes in anxiety and borderline significant ( p = 0.0499) changes in pain scores across the three surgical modalities.

The difference in TEP levels after the second cycle of chemotherapy was borderline significant ( p = 0.0499; 52.1 ± 14.8 (20–76) vs. 81.8 ± 39.2 (34–146) ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.

The Constant scores also showed more improvement in group S&P than group S at 2 years after surgery, but the mean difference in scores was borderline significant (13.4 vs 9.9, respectively; P = .050).

Within macula-on patients, there was a borderline significant increase over time (0.011 [0.00005; 0.022], p = 0.050).

Sensitivity analysis of the association of LI with cirrhosis showed a borderline significant difference in risk of cirrhosis for LI1 versus LI2–3 (HR [95% CI]: 0.44 [0.20–1.00], p = 0.050).

During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

No association was observed between protein intake and TIR, TAR, or TBR ( p -values ≥ 0.07); however, a borderline significant reduction of −1.9% (95% CI: −3.9%, 0.0%; p = 0.05) TBR per 20 g protein was observed following MICT in analyses stratified by exercise mode.

Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).

Another study found between-group differences that were borderline significant in positive urgency between gambling disorder ( n = 31) and bipolar disorder ( n = 19, p =.05; [ 62 ]; Individuals with gambling disorder endorsed lower levels of positive urgency than individuals with bipolar disorder.

SM had a significant deceleration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.008), and EC had a borderline significant decelaration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.05, Table 1 , F i g. 1 I).

BOLD, a community-based intervention, demonstrated borderline significant decreases in perceived pain as moderate/severe (45.5% to 38.2% at post-test; p = 0.05) [ 37 ].

23 This meta-analysis showed that the control group exhibited a significant reduction in the plaque score at 6 months ( P < .001) and a borderline significant decrease in overall changes compared with the MI group ( P = .05).

no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).

FGA rs6050 genotypes were similarly distributed in the whole cases and controls, reaching borderline significant results by comparing the allele frequency in the RPL subgroup (OR = 0.58; 0.33–1.0; P = 0.05).

While building the multivariable predictive model for SD, we found that diabetes was borderline significant with a negative association ( p = 0.05), even though it was not significant in univariable comparisons ( p = 0.94).

Similar observations were demonstrated in the CON group, with a borderline significant ( p = 0.05) reduction in SBP of −1.4 mmHg [−2.8;0.0] and a significant ( p = 0.03) reduction in DBP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.8;−0.1], resulting in a reduction ( p = 0.01) in MAP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.6;−0.3].

A borderline significant relationship was found between LSM and age ( r = .34; P = .05).

In the patient group, response times to addition sums that bridged a decade (M = 4431.18, SD = 4197.4) showed a borderline significant difference from those addition sums that did not bridge a decade (M = 3698.98, SD = 3765); standardized test statistic = −1.96, n = 9, p = 0.05.

rvention with vorapaxar as compared with placebo. PAI-2 decreased significantly in favor of vorapaxar as compared with placebo in the total study population ( p = 0.025) at late FU, essentially driven by changes in the post-MI (chronic CHD) patients ( p = 0.054), whereas vorapaxar induced a borderline significant increase ( p = 0.05) in NSTEMI (TRACER) patients during short-term therapy ( Table 6 ).

The item 'the obstetric or medical problems I might encounter during pregnancy' was also borderline significantly different between groups ( P = 0.05).

However, the sex interaction P -values were only borderline significant ( P = 0.05–0.11) due to lack of statistical power, except for AF-PRS post-PCI ( P = 0.003).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

When comparing the AUCs of MELD-Na and the ML model, we observed a statistically borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05).

Age was a borderline significant predictor ( p = 0.05).

Specifically, we observed a statistically significant 25% decrease in claudin-2, a 20% decrease in claudin-3, and a borderline significant ( p < 0.05, one-tailed Student’s t-test) 35% decrease in claudin-5 because of quercetin treatment.