“borderline significant”

2 A) and were borderline significant after adjustment for ctDNA% (HR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.31–6.55, BH adj. p = 0.051, Fig. 2 A).

Patients with reduced meals had a borderline significant increase in odds of having undernutrition (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.99–4.74, p = 0.051).

The only difference observed between the children populations of the two cities with regard to demographic characteristics was a higher presence of young siblings in Milan, which was borderline significant (p= 0.051).

This means that a strongly nonsignificant p -value is equally likely to be treated by publication selection bias and dropped with an equal probability in the case of publication bias as it is in the case of p-hacking (e.g., borderline significant results, p = 0.051 or far off p = 0.9).

There was weak, borderline significant association between higher ERP standardisation and clinician adherence and lower mortality rates ( r = -–0.219, p = 0.051).

Liquid penetration was slower at higher compaction pressures, and this was found to be significant for preheated tablets with SSG ( p < 0.001), but only borderline significant for those with XPVP ( p = 0.051).

Interestingly patients with AB blood type had a borderline significant better initial admission status expressed in a higher GCS score (p = 0.051 mean GCS 11.5) compared to non-AB patients.

Furthermore, using a paired t -test, we found a significant increase in pesticide safety practices ( p < 0.05) in the intervention group and a borderline significant increase regarding in-home safety ( p = 0.051) in the control group.

The mean fertilised oocytes in each patient of Group A was 9.8 ± 5.8 while it was 7.6 ± 5.1 in Group B with borderline significant difference ( P = 0.051) between the two groups.

At arsenic exposure levels exceeding 750 μg/L, difference in OR estimates between class S allele carriers and non-carriers was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

The relationship between comorbidity and self-care maintenance was borderline significant, indicating that with every unit increase in comorbidity score there was an increase in self-care maintenance score by 1 unit ( p = 0.051). 3.3.2.

All six lung cancer patients had positive aCL antibodies, and colon cancer patients had a borderline significant association ( p = 0.051).

In the current study, no significant differences were observed between IOPcc and IOPg in the ACI group; however, the result was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

With adjustment for sex, age and SES in the final model, there was no increased risk of chronic pain, and no significantly increased risk of pain-related disability for those in the MA-group, but there was a borderline significant risk of pain-related disability in the HMA-group group compared with the H-group (OR = 2.35, CI 1.00–5.52, P = 0.051).

CES-D ≥ 16), and separate categorical analyses revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of subjects in the surgical (44%) and non-surgical (30%) groups who scored at or above this cut-off at 1 year ( p = 0.051).

None of the other pairwise comparisons was statistically significant (although the F8 to F32 difference was borderline significant, P = 0.051).

Neither TaASN2 nor TaASN3 were affected significantly by the nitrogen treatment, but TaASN1 expression did show a significant (p < 0.001, F-test) effect of nitrogen treatment on its own and a borderline significant (p = 0.051, F-test) effect of the treatment interacting with time.

For PW, the direction and magnitude of the initial GI associations were similar and were borderline significant in the fully adjusted model in the overall sample (B: 4.27, p = 0.051 vs.

OAB was not significantly associated with post-infectious IBS in the Giardia exposed group, but strongly associated with sporadic IBS in the control group, and the risk difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

The difference between Denmark and UK was borderline significant (p = 0.051).

Patients with a non-pCR status had a borderline significant risk of recurrence (HR, 10.387; 95% CI, 0.992–108.801; P = 0.051).

The third important finding of this study is that low eGFR was significantly associated with new-onset hypertension in the traditional definition population ( p < 0.001), whereas the association was only borderline significant in the new definition population ( p = 0.051).

A combined (group × rate × polarity) ANOVA revealed a borderline significant interaction between group and polarity ( F (1,6) = 5.91; P = 0.051), providing some evidence that the threshold difference between fixed and alternating polarity was larger for ABI users than for CI users.

During the follow-up, patients with post-traumatic stress disorder had persistently higher scores on the HADS total score up to the third evaluation and anxiety subscore up to the fourth evaluation (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.047 to 4.935, p < 0.05), with higher scores on sleep quality (worse sleep) (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.372 to 3.539, p < 0.03) at the first, third, and fourth evaluations, with lower scores on health-related quality of life at the first, second, and fourth evaluations (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.615 to 3.634, p < 0.02), and a borderline significant difference at the second evaluation (“ t ” test, t = 1.980, p = 0.051).

Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in IOP and a borderline significant difference in medication use (p = 0.051) between phakic and pseudophakic eyes.