“borderline significant”

Age older than 65 years and LQTS were also associated with arrhythmic death with borderline significant p values (HR 3.046 [95% CI 0.996–9.316, p = 0.051 and HR 3.877 [95% CI 0.858–17.509], p = 0.078, respectively] (Supplement Table S1 ).

Timed up and go (TUG) time was reduced by 0.64 ± 2.1 seconds ( P = 0.04) in the EXD group while the CON group saw a borderline significant increase of 0.71 sec ( P = 0.051).

When patients were subgrouped by SIG, a borderline significant association was seen in the SIG 0 cohort—80%/81%/77%/46% ( P = 0.051) of patients for TNM I/II/III/IV disease, respectively.

Moreover, we also observed a borderline significant protective association between the rs1042522 C>G polymorphism and neuroblastoma risk in males (adjusted OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.44-1.00, P =0.051).

Patients with malignancy had higher CRP levels, D-dimer, and TLC, as well as lower lymphocyte count, Hb, hematocrit, and CrCl (CrCl borderline significant, p = 0.051).

With adjustment for sex, age and SES in the final model, there was no increased risk of chronic pain, and no significantly increased risk of pain-related disability for those in the MA-group, but there was a borderline significant risk of pain-related disability in the HMA-group group compared with the H-group (OR = 2.35, CI 1.00–5.52, P = 0.051).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed a significant association of this SNP with myocardial infarction ( p = 0.013; Wald test) and a borderline significant association of rs2768759 and all-cause mortality ( p = 0.051; Wald test).

Differences were statistically significant for total SCFAs ( p = 0.028), in line with the correlation results, as well as for acetate ( p = 0.041) and propionate ( p = 0.028), and borderline significant in the case of butyrate ( p = 0.051), isobutyrate ( p = 0.084), and isovalerate ( p = 0.090) ( Figure 8 ).

A borderline significant OS benefit was observed with FTD–TPI + bevacizumab after accounting for time-dependent effects (Wald test P = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S6 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106907 ).

Chi-squared analysis of the POEM categories and ISAAC severe cases was borderline significant (p = 0.051) ( Table 4 ).

Only light PA was borderline significant ( p = 0.051) in the full intervention group.

However, light fruits were borderline significant in linear regression ( p = 0.051), we can’t conclude from our findings that there are real differences between light fruits and sleep quality.

Interestingly, excluding participants with active treatments strengthened the association between TyG index trajectories with arterial stiffness; relative to the low-stable group, the high-increasing group had the highest odds for arterial stiffness (OR = 3.57 (1.45, 9.63), P = 0.037), and the moderate group showed a borderline significant association with arterial stiffness (OR = 3.54 (1.00, 9.59), P = 0.051) after adjustment for various confounders.

There was a borderline significant reduction in retinopathy with more intensive BP lowering (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–1.00, p = 0.051) but substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of the effect across the included studies ( I 2 = 65.5%, p = 0.033) ( Figure 4 ) mostly attributable to the ACCORD result.

These lesions were generally smaller than those treated microsurgically, though the size difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

There was a borderline significant correlation ( P < 0.051) between the use of the ARCS codes and the total number of coded behaviours per consultation.

The relationship between comorbidity and self-care maintenance was borderline significant, indicating that with every unit increase in comorbidity score there was an increase in self-care maintenance score by 1 unit ( p = 0.051). 3.3.2.

CES-D ≥ 16), and separate categorical analyses revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of subjects in the surgical (44%) and non-surgical (30%) groups who scored at or above this cut-off at 1 year ( p = 0.051).

The difference between Denmark and UK was borderline significant (p = 0.051).

Women were in majority in both groups, but the proportion of men was increased in those presenting with retinal tears, a borderline significant difference ( P =0.051).

A borderline significant difference was noted when the number of residual tumours in reTURBTs was analysed, with fewer cases of residual tumour in the en-bloc group (p = 0.051).

The difference-in-differences estimator result showed a 9% difference in clean cord care practices among the participants (p = 0.025), 12.2% in skin to skin care (p = 0.022), and borderline significant increase in early initiation of breastfeeding (10.5%, p = 0.051).

BMI showed a borderline significant effect ( p = 0.051), while sex ( p = 0.411) and height ( p = 0.816) did not significantly influence COP metrics.

The size and location of bone exposure at diagnosis were borderline significant (P = 0.051 and P = 0.061, respectively).

Molecular function OXNOS In lowlanders, chronic HA decreased A • − ( P = 0.034, d = −0.852, borderline significant following non‐parametric analysis: P = 0.051, r = −0.461).