A decrease in prevalence of sensory deficits was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Level of education was borderline significant (p = 0.051); with the tertiary educated more likely to recall the campaign, (AdjOR 1.36, 95%CI 0.99–1.86).
This association remained significant even after adjusting for serum creatinine at baseline (aOR 23.003, 95% CI 1.121-471.776, P =0.042), macroalbuminuria at baseline (aOR 21.968, 95% CI 1.085-444.659, P =0.044), use of SGLT2 inhibitors (aOR 23.496, 95% CI 1.208-456.928, P =0.037), and use of statins (aOR 40.208, 95% CI 1.389-1164.178, P =0.031), but the association became borderline significant after adjusting for the use of antihypertensive agents (aOR 17.968, 95% CI 0.990-326.052, P =0.051).
No statistically significant difference was observed in VD parameters of the SCP and DCP ( P = 0.102–0.894); only a borderline significant decrease was found in the temporal SCP VD ( P = 0.051) in the post-COVID group.
Moreover, none of the pairwise comparisons reached statistical significance after applying the Bonferroni correction (adjusted p > 0.05 for all comparisons), but a strong trend showing borderline significant difference was observed for ischemic CV vs. non-CV non trauma groups ( p = 0.051, Table 4 ).
There was a borderline significant difference between participants according to randomised format (standard format 72% vs multilayered format 88%, p=0.051, figure 5 ).
The mean fertilised oocytes in each patient of Group A was 9.8 ± 5.8 while it was 7.6 ± 5.1 in Group B with borderline significant difference ( P = 0.051) between the two groups.
In an analysis of individual mosquito data adjusted for human participant, we observed a borderline significant lower proportion of infected wild mosquitoes (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45–1.00; P = 0.051); plausibly reflecting differences in the number of mosquito observations in experiments.
This difference was observed for all VB1 consensus sequences, being of borderline significant for the VB1-2 consensus sequence (p = 0.051).
The relationship between comorbidity and self-care maintenance was borderline significant, indicating that with every unit increase in comorbidity score there was an increase in self-care maintenance score by 1 unit ( p = 0.051). 3.3.2.
Central macular thickness was significantly lower in intravitreal dexamethasone implant–treated eyes than in topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors–treated eyes at Months 1 and 7, whereas mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in eyes treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors at Month 12 (borderline significant P = 0.0510).
CES-D ≥ 16), and separate categorical analyses revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of subjects in the surgical (44%) and non-surgical (30%) groups who scored at or above this cut-off at 1 year ( p = 0.051).
Conversely, in patients with collateral status grade 3, bridging therapy demonstrated no statistically significant association with functional independence (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.473 [0.121–1.842], P = 0.280), whereas the improvement in global functional outcomes showed borderline significant trend (adjusted common OR [95% CI]: 0.391 [0.150–0.991], P = 0.051) that did not reach the pre-specified statistical threshold (Table 4 and Fig. 2).
In the advanced disease study, the proportion of patients with detectable IL1β was significantly higher in gastro-oesophageal junction cancers than in other sites ( p = 0.006) and IL12 was detected more frequently in gastric cancers, although this was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).
In this case, only a borderline significant difference was found ( P =0.051) for the overall comparison.
There was also a borderline significant difference in the diagnostic methods used between women with and without PCOS ( P = .051), raising the possibility that GDM diagnosis may have varied between subgroups.
When changes in PD were considered, the association of flavonoid intake with reduced PD became borderline significant ( p = .051) but persisted for IL‐1β ( p = .018).
Faith's PD remained statistically significant after controlling for age (HR 0.55, P = 0.041) or the number of metastatic sites (HR 0.47, P = 0.009), and borderline significant after adjusting for liver metastases (HR 0.54, P = 0.051) (Table S4 ).
Huang et al only analyzed whethe RASSF1A promoter methylation was linked to tumor stage (five studies with 252 cases) and grade (four studies with 190 cases), showing that RASSF1A promoter methylation had a borderline significant correlation with tumor stage ( P =0.051) and a significant association with tumor grade ( P =0.001). 49 Our meta-analysis involving more patients suggested that RASSF1A promoter methylation was significantly linked to tumor grade (13 studies with 686 patients with RCC, P <0.001) and clinical stage (8 studies with 463 patients with RCC, P =0.001).
The mixed model analysis yielded an effect for Time ( F = 5.41; df = 8, p < .001), a trend for Condition ( F = 4.84; df = 1, p = .061) and a borderline significant interaction for Time × Condition ( F = 2.32; df = 8, p = .051).
The increase in the mOS difference between patients with high levels of TGFB1 and MGMT methylation compared to those with low levels of TGFB1 and MGMT methylation was borderline significant (14.5 versus 36.9 months, respectively; Adj. p = 0.051) ( Figure 1 B).
For PW, the direction and magnitude of the initial GI associations were similar and were borderline significant in the fully adjusted model in the overall sample (B: 4.27, p = 0.051 vs.
However, it is important to note that some of the effect sizes, such as the borderline significant total indirect effect observed between TC and ln(HOMA) ( p = 0.051), should be interpreted cautiously.
However, there was a borderline significant effect of sex on NA: F (1,52) = 3.99, p = 0.051 with a mean of 17.1 (95% CI: 13.9–20.3) in males and 13.1 (95% CI: 10.8–15.5) in females.
After stratification on time to diagnosis, we observed a borderline significant lower inflammatory score in cases diagnosed less than 6 years after inclusion in the pooled B-cell NHL population (β = −1.27, p = 0.051, Table 3A ).