Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 13,764 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP =0.0511.0× alphagold
This association remained significant even after adjusting for serum creatinine at baseline (aOR 23.003, 95% CI 1.121-471.776, P =0.042), macroalbuminuria at baseline (aOR 21.968, 95% CI 1.085-444.659, P =0.044), use of SGLT2 inhibitors (aOR 23.496, 95% CI 1.208-456.928, P =0.037), and use of statins (aOR 40.208, 95% CI 1.389-1164.178, P =0.031), but the association became borderline significant after adjusting for the use of antihypertensive agents (aOR 17.968, 95% CI 0.990-326.052, P =0.051).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Moreover, none of the pairwise comparisons reached statistical significance after applying the Bonferroni correction (adjusted p > 0.05 for all comparisons), but a strong trend showing borderline significant difference was observed for ischemic CV vs. non-CV non trauma groups ( p = 0.051, Table 4 ).
borderline significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In an analysis of individual mosquito data adjusted for human participant, we observed a borderline significant lower proportion of infected wild mosquitoes (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45–1.00; P = 0.051); plausibly reflecting differences in the number of mosquito observations in experiments.
borderline significantP = 0.05101.0× alphagold
Central macular thickness was significantly lower in intravitreal dexamethasone implant–treated eyes than in topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors–treated eyes at Months 1 and 7, whereas mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in eyes treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors at Month 12 (borderline significant P = 0.0510).
borderline significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Conversely, in patients with collateral status grade 3, bridging therapy demonstrated no statistically significant association with functional independence (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.473 [0.121–1.842], P = 0.280), whereas the improvement in global functional outcomes showed borderline significant trend (adjusted common OR [95% CI]: 0.391 [0.150–0.991], P = 0.051) that did not reach the pre-specified statistical threshold (Table 4 and Fig. 2).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the advanced disease study, the proportion of patients with detectable IL1β was significantly higher in gastro-oesophageal junction cancers than in other sites ( p = 0.006) and IL12 was detected more frequently in gastric cancers, although this was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).
borderline significantP =0.0511.0× alphagold
Huang et al only analyzed whethe RASSF1A promoter methylation was linked to tumor stage (five studies with 252 cases) and grade (four studies with 190 cases), showing that RASSF1A promoter methylation had a borderline significant correlation with tumor stage ( P =0.051) and a significant association with tumor grade ( P =0.001). 49 Our meta-analysis involving more patients suggested that RASSF1A promoter methylation was significantly linked to tumor grade (13 studies with 686 patients with RCC, P <0.001) and clinical stage (8 studies with 463 patients with RCC, P =0.001).