“borderline significant”

Heart failure was borderline significant (P=0.051).

The bivariate analysis revealed a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.051) in favor of non-smokers compared to smokers in reporting their oral health status.

After stratification on time to diagnosis, we observed a borderline significant lower inflammatory score in cases diagnosed less than 6 years after inclusion in the pooled B-cell NHL population (β = −1.27, p = 0.051, Table 3A ).

After adjustments, the associations attenuated and were non-significant, however, for women in cohort 3 the association was borderline significant (5.7% faster gait speed, p = 0.051 compared to cohort 1).

The association of body weight with CPI concentration in the linear regression analysis was borderline significant (1% increase per 10% increase in body weight, P = 0.0511).

Hispanic men had a significantly lower risk of death than non-Hispanic white men; this difference remained borderline significant after adjusting for other factors (p = 0.0511).

Moreover, a borderline significant negative correlation was found with nuclear grade ( P =0.0511 for MMP-2 and 0.0794 for MMP-9).

The latter (norepinephrine) showed a borderline significant interaction effect with the intervention (F(5, 90)= 2.303; p = 0.0511).

However, after multiple comparisons adjustment, the association of GGAGCGC became insignificant; whereas the apparent association between haplotype AAAAAGC and sE-selectin levels became borderline significant (FDR P = 0.0511).

indicated that taxane chemotherapy was associated with a borderline significant increase in risk of mild swelling compared to no chemotherapy (HR 1.31, p = 0.0512), and a significant increase in risk of mild swelling compared to non-taxane chemotherapy (HR 1.86, p = 0.0398).

Parent role modelling: parents reported significant increases in the days that their child saw them drink low-fat milk (0.87 days, P = 0.0324) and there was a borderline significant decrease in the number of days that their child saw them eating fast food (−0.33 days, P = 0.0513).

Instead, the increased expression of miR-146a-5p in ulcerated melanomas was borderline significant ( p = 0.0513) ( Figure 4 ).

Finally, a Cox proportional hazards model that included the demographic factors in Table 1 and lung cancer stage showed that abnormal galectin-1 levels were not significantly correlated with OS, with a hazard ratio of 2.928 (95% CI of 0.9940 to 8.625), yet it was borderline significant with p = 0.0513.

Diabetes measures An adjusted regression model did not find a significant association between EHR use and eye screening among diabetes patients, though the results were borderline significant (p = 0.0514) in the unadjusted model.

There was a borderline significant sex by resource guarding status interaction for likelihood of return ( X 2 = 3.80, d.f. = 1, p = 0.0514).

(2007b) yielded a borderline significant effect favoring DFP (SMD: −0.21; 95% CI: −0.42 to 0.00; P = 0.0515), suggesting that this particular study may have influenced the overall result.

A model including a term for interaction between time and self-rated health was tested, and the test was significant for women ( P = 0.0056), while it was borderline significant for men ( P = 0.0516).

Figure 6 shows that cDCs stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation better than PBMCs ( p = 0.0174), and also better, although borderline significant, than monocytes ( p = 0.0517) ( Figure 6 ).

Chi squared is borderline significant for small type 1 clusters (32% divergent clusters) versus all genes (29% divergent clusters; chi squared 7.7374, df = 3, P = 0.0518) but not sliding window SR clusters (28% divergent clusters) versus all genes (chi squared 5.6318, df = 3, P = 0.1310).

CPZ had a strong effect on the density of OLs that had proliferated during the stimulation period (EdU + OLIG2 + ) (F(1,28) = 34.79, p < 0.0001; see Figure 2 E), and tACS tended to increase the number of these OLs, with a borderline significant stimulation effect (F(1,28) = 4.124, p = 0.0519) and interaction effect between diet and stimulation (F(1,28) = 3.785, p = 0.0618).

However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02).

The number of G's appearing in the pID also appeared to have a small but borderline significant effect, with error probability increasing as the number of G's increases ( P = 0.052).

The difference between the number of antibiotic-resistant isolates in the dental units and those found at the other sampling points was borderline significant (Pearson chi2 = 3.4076; p = 0.052).

Egger’s test indicated a statistically significant presence of publication bias (β = − 6.77, z = − 3.30, p = 0.001), whereas Begg’s test was borderline significant (z = − 2.02, p = 0.052).To evaluate the potential impact of publication bias on the pooled prevalence estimate, the Trim-and-Fill method was applied using a random-effects (REML) model.

There was only borderline significant differences among the three hospital catchments areas with respect to the response of the victims that the dog was unavailable for observation (χ 2 = 5.911; P = 0.052).