“borderline significant”

In the RV the correlation was only borderline significant (p=0.052).

Effects were borderline significant in the unadjusted model, but in the opposite expected direction (PR 1.58, 95% CI 1.00–2.52, p value = 0.052); they were not statistically significant when adjusted for SES imbalance (aPR 1.55, 95% CI 0.95–2.52, p value = 0.290).

sCCA detected a borderline significant association ( p = .052) between “cluster 1” (which included both delusions of influence and grandiose delusions), and the same SNP rs11411529.

Similarly, SOX2 expression was higher in moderately differentiated OSCC patients (71%), but this too was borderline significant ( P =0.052). 3.6.

The rehabilitation group showed a borderline significant reduction of 0.01 from baseline to postintervention ( P = .052).

Additionally, total plaque volume showed a borderline significant association ( P = 0.052).

However, fewer respondents in the control group reported that a lack of routines for asking questions (p = 0.03) and a lack of routines for managing the response (borderline significant, p = 0.052) were barriers to asking questions at follow-up.

suis -positive pigs, which was borderline significant (68% vs 44%, p = 0.052).

The difference in recipient age was borderline significant (60.9 years vs. 59.0 years, p = 0.052).

For the IBS-SSS total score, the differences between expectation and score after consumption were significant for produced wheat bread based on the current recipe ( p = 0.007) and borderline significant for traditionally produced wheat bread by trend ( p = 0.052; Figure 2 F).

It is also noteworthy that the significance was more robust in the right masseter ( p = 0.023), while the left was borderline significant ( p = 0.052), providing support for a bilateral finding, albeit with asymmetry.

The results of stratification for the overall stage revealed a borderline significant difference in LRRFS, favouring treatment with IMRT in patients with stage III–IV disease (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08–1.10; P = 0.052).

The overall effect of donor type on hemoglobin recovery was only borderline significant ( p = 0.052).

The model was found to be borderline significant in the univariate regression analysis (p=0.052), while the multivariate regression analysis found it to be insignificant (p=0.100).

When Cox regressions were applied separately to subgroup of physical fitness parameters, 12 min running test was borderline significant (hazard ratio, HR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.996–1.00002, p = 0.052) ( Table 3 ).

On the other hand, TROY expression was higher in the tumor-adjacent normal tissue of the distal stomach (3.5 ± 1.1) versus the proximal (2.7 ± 0.8) region, which was borderline significant ( p = 0.052, Table 3 ).

Here, fibulin-2 expression showed a borderline significant association with RFS (p = 0.052; Table 4 ).

The HR for Q2–4 combined as compared to Q1 was significant in the univariate analysis [1.42 (1.09–1.99), p = 0.046], but became borderline significant after adjusting for the variables in Model 3 [1.42 (1.00–2.04), p = 0.052], as shown in Table 4 .

There was a borderline significant difference between educational groups when asked whether the participants had learned something new ( P =.052).

Q1 vs Q2 ∆mean = P = 0.008, Q1 vs Q3 ∆mean = P = 0.001) whereas the difference was borderline significant between first and fourth quartile (Q1 vs Q4 ∆mean = P = 0.052), in the fully adjusted model.

Upon additional adjustment for BMI, the association with CHF was rendered nonsignificant, and the association with CVD was borderline significant ( P = 0.052).

Respiratory infections in the treatment (non-placebo) cohorts of the STRIVE ENVISION groups rose significantly from 21% of the treatment group at the start of PERSIST to 29% after 144 weeks of treatment ( p = 0.039—by paired χ 2 test of proportions in a single sample) while pulmonary exacerbations rose at the same timepoints from 38% to 46% (borderline significant: p = 0.052).

aureus bacteremia, mortality was reduced, although this difference was only borderline significant ( P = 0.052), indicating a trend in improvement of survival rate in skin infected mice with subsequent endogenous bacteremia.

However, AI at the most telomeric marker D11S2071 showed a borderline significant association with earlier relapse compared to patients not showing and AI around this locus (p = 0.052)( Figure S1 ).

Median ppFEV 1 measurements in non-asthmatic children (n=267) were higher (87.2% (79.0–94.5)) compared with asthmatic children (72.4% (67.0–82.1)) with a borderline significant difference (p = 0.052) ( table 3 ).