“close to being statistically significant”

In this scenario, the difference from the sensitivity of the MHD model (0.73) is close to being statistically significant.

Since our results for LASct and the LAEF were close to being statistically significant (with p-values between 0.051 and 0.07, respectively), the relatively small group size could be an explanation.

The correlation between the mean dose and SUVmean relative difference was significant in five assessed regions: R hippocampus (r (22) = 0.45, p = 0.03), L occipital lobe (r (23) = 0.52, p = 0.01), L parietal lobe (r (23) = 0.66, p = 0.001), frontal lobe (r (23) = 0.42, p = 0.05), and R occipital lobe (r (23) = 0.55, p = 0.01), and one assessed region, the cerebellum (r (23) = 0.37, p = 0.08), was close to being statistically significant ( Table 3a ).

In our study, although no relation was found between cisplatin dose (cumulative cisplatin dose >435 mg) and SNHL, this relationship was close to being statistically significant.

WOMAC scores also come close to being statistically significant at 6 months.

While there were no significant differences in age, gender and tumour site between the two groups, the P value of the age comparison was very close to being statistically significant ( Table 1 ). 3.3 Comparison of the CT enhancement rate as a function of the tumour necrosis rate Comparison of the initial CT enhancement rate pre-chemotherapy: the average enhancement rate was 1.75 (median 1.68, range 1.18–2.51) in the group with a necrosis rate greater than 90% and 1.62 (median 1.52, range 1.00–2.41) in the group with a necrosis rate<90%.

Although no statistically significant sex-based difference was found, it was close to being statistically significant.

In addition, the differences in glucose and urea levels between the first and third tertiles of fT3 came close to being statistically significant.

The only result close to being statistically significant (test probability values of p minimally above 0.05) was found for the WHOQOL-BREF measures.

None of the differences between treatment and comparison state participants are statistically significantly different from the null in these analyses, but the point estimates for vaccination uptake are in the positive direction and are close to being statistically significant in the models for vaccination uptake a first follow-up.

The genotypes of rs3181098 were close to being statistically significant (GG vs.

But with a p -value of 0.059, the difference in airway volume was very close to being statistically significant in those that reported a reduction of the symptoms after a period of 6 months.

The change in relative abundance of bifidobacteria over time was close to being statistically significant in the B. infantis vs.

During the reproductive season, although the taxonomic richness of exotic parrots showed a non-significant association with the area ( p = 0.051), the obtained p -value suggests that the relationship was close to being statistically significant.

The higher median in the Work group over time was also close to being statistically significant.

They did not differ in respect to the majority of parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, TLC, RV and AV, TLCOc/AV), however FVC and FEV1 were close to being statistically significant.

Fourth, an explanation for the statistical differences in the age-stratified analyses might be due to statistical power, where more workers <50 years are lifting for 1⁄2 and 3⁄4 of the workday than workers ≥50 years, and the lower CI is close to being statistically significant among workers <50 years lifting 3⁄4 of the workday.

However, some parameters (lipoperoxides, protein carbonyls, and activity of paraoxonase A) have p -values that are close to being statistically significant, indicating a possible trend that warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.

We have also attempted to establish aging-related differences at the phosphoproteome level, particularly in regards to mitochondrial processes (see figure below), but only GOcc: mitochondrion and GObp: mitochondrial transport come close to being statistically significant (raw p-values of 0.05 and 0.08, respectively) in the control comparison.

Multiple comparisons between the injury risk mitigation pooled effects of the different IPPs and with the control group The findings of this second part inform that most of the IPPs exhibit either statistically significant effects or values close to being statistically significant (according to their upper 95%CIs that are approaching the value of 1) injury risk mitigation effects (overall, lower extremity and ankle injuries) when compared to their respective control groups ( Figure 3a,b ,e).

33.3%) and were 2 times more likely to develop ED (OR: 2.00, 95%CI: 0.982–4.08, p = 0.055), although these differences were close to being statistically significant.

However, the effect of low educational attainment is close to being statistically significant and we argue that this suggests that there are effects of educational attainment and the risk of ME/CFS, even when comparing with a population that innately controls for the effect of educational attainment on the likelihood of hospital diagnosis.

The association between physician diagnosis of depression and OVS was close to being statistically significant. 4.

No statistically significant changes of BCVA were found, while decrease of macular volume was close to being statistically significant (р = 0.06).

Interestingly, three variables (FES-I, IPAQ-7 and Sit-to-Stand test) reached significance, while two others (HGS-right hand and anticipatory reaction in MiniBEST) were close to being statistically significant despite the limited number of participants.