Barely Significant
← all phrases

close to being statistically significant

70 sentences · 70 papers · 259 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.055

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

However, the effect of low educational attainment is close to being statistically significant and we argue that this suggests that there are effects of educational attainment and the risk of ME/CFS, even when comparing with a population that innately controls for the effect of educational attainment on the likelihood of hospital diagnosis.
Interestingly, three variables (FES-I, IPAQ-7 and Sit-to-Stand test) reached significance, while two others (HGS-right hand and anticipatory reaction in MiniBEST) were close to being statistically significant despite the limited number of participants.
Although the effect size could be considered as very weak, it is close to being statistically significant at the 10% level, suggesting a potential weak inverse relationship where an increase in GDP might slightly reduce the rate of increase in oral cancer mortality in the following year.
The evaluation of fAGP and six tumor makers to diagnose malignancy indicated that CA19-9 ( p = 0.0019) and SPan-1 ( p = 0.0241) had a statistically significant difference in pancreas cancer but that no such significance was observed in the other factors nor in the other diseases with all factors even though there were a few exceptions that were close to being statistically significant.
Compared to the participants with stage 1 hypertension, those with prehypertension had lower mean LVM values for all of the indices measured, with statistically significant differences in three of the four measurements (Sokolow–Lyon voltage–duration product, Cornell voltage, and Cornell voltage–duration product) and a trend that was close to being statistically significant for the fourth measurement (Sokolov–Lyon voltage).
DISCUSSION The salient findings of our study are as follows: (1) at a simulated intraocular pressure of 50 mmHg, there is a statistically significant difference in total volume of egressed fluid from the silicone tube with one versus two fenestration(s); (2) there is no significant difference if simulated IOP is 40 mmHg or less (the 40 mmHg group was very close to being statistically significant with a P -value of 0.08); (3) in the opening pressure trials, the second fenestration opened at a pressure of 28.83 ± 5.09 mmHg.
44 - 48 Some variables reported in previous studies to be a prognostic factor of Barthel Index at discharge, such as time from stroke, 49 functional independence, 37 and orientation, 50 were only close to being statistically significant in our analysis.