“extremely significant”

The protective factors for renal injury exhibit five extremely significant immune cell traits ( P < 0.01), namely central memory CD4 – CD8 – T cell % T cell (OR = 0.007, P = 7.83 × 10 –4 ), CD8 on central memory CD8 + T cell (OR = 0.116, P = 0.003), BAFF-R on IgD – CD38 + B cell (OR = 0.086, P = 0.006), CD4 – CD8 – NK T cell % T cell (OR = 0.068, P = 0.007), and CD25 ++ CD45RA – CD4 + non-regulatory T cell (non-Treg) absolute count (OR = 0.041, P = 0.007).

Statistical differences among the data were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests, both at a significance level of p < 0.05 and at an extremely significant level of p < 0.01.

In terms of plan quality assessment, the total MU for the H group was significantly higher (1066.704 ± 135.183) than that for the T group (772.992 ± 104.023), with extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.01).

The results indicate an extremely significant difference in body size between the large and small pig populations in this study ( P < 0.01, P < 0.001).

T esticular weight and volume, epididymal sperm count and deformity rate, and t esticular mRNA expressions of rat were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p < 0.05 and extremely significant difference p < 0.01.

The results show that among the test variables used in this study, A (ratio of water to material), B (extraction temperature), and A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant for the extraction rate of EUPS ( p < 0.01).

Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).

“*” and “**” represent significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), respectively.

The t -test showed an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups ( Table 1 ).

*** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), * p < 0.05 (significant).

The different lowercase letters represented significant differences between groups ( P < 0.05), and the different capital letters represented extremely significant differences between groups ( P < 0.01).

Analysis of Year and Treatment Interaction Effects on Sugarcane Yield-Related Traits The treatment had extremely significant effects on all yield-related traits ( p < 0.01), indicating that treatment is the primary factor influencing sugarcane yield and associated agronomic characteristics ( Table 1 ).

Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

A higher CV TH may reduce the light available to under-story and mid-story plants in the forest [ 17 , 55 ], which explains the extremely significant negative correlation observed in Figure 7 c ( p < 0.01).

"**" indicates an extremely significant difference, with P ≤ 0.01.

minima was the largest, at 6.1333 and 18.2966, respectively, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

The results showed that the mitochondrial membrane potential of the 15% S group was 0.25 ± 0.06 and 0.34 ± 0.05 higher than that of the 20% S group and 5% S group, respectively, with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

The VH of the duodenal segment in the LPS + H-MPTA group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01); the VH/CD ratio also increased significantly ( p < 0.01).

Factors B and C had extremely significant synergies among them ( p < 0.01), and quadratic terms ( B 2 , C 2 ) also significantly influenced extraction rates. 3.2.3.

By measuring serum antioxidant indicators and levels of inflammatory factors, we found that most antioxidant indicators exhibited significant decreases ( p < 0.05), while most inflammatory factor mRNA indicators (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8) showed extremely significant reductions ( p < 0.01).

Primary terms A and C and interaction terms A 2 and B 2 reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.01), and interaction item C 2 reached significant levels ( P < 0.01).

Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and were declared extremely significant at p < 0.01.

2014 ), bacterial or fungal genera with extremely significant ( P < 0.01), strong correlations (Spearman’s correlation, r > 0.7) with other bacterial or fungal genera were selected (Xia et al. 2020 ).

All raw data were analyzed through repeated tests, and significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) were analyzed. 3.