“extremely significant”

The results are shown in Table S3 , which shows that the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Selection in CSWG breed For CSWG, selected candidate genes were significantly enriched in 44 GO terms ( P < 0.05), and among which, 12 terms were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Figure S 3 ).

Among them, COL5A1, VCAN, PTGS2, and ITGAV showed extremely significant increases ( P < 0.01); ITGA8 was significantly decreased in the plaque group and thrombosis group ( P < 0.01).

* Means significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** means extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** means extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001). 5.

At the phylum level, significant interannual differences were observed: Campilobacterota showed extremely significant differences among the 3 years (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01), while 9 other phyla (including: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi) exhibited super-significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 2A ).

Analyzing the results shown in Figure 6 , the peaks X1, X2, and X6 showed significant correlation with ABTS radical scavenging (P< 0.05), while peaks X4 and X10 exhibited extremely significant correlation with ABTS radical scavenging (P< 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

The mean δ 2 H was significantly different in rice crayfish, pond crayfish, and wild crayfish ( p < 0.05, shown in Figure 2 ), with the rice crayfish and pond crayfish groups showing extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01, shown in Figure 2 ).

Statistical differences among the data were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests, both at a significance level of p < 0.05 and at an extremely significant level of p < 0.01.

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

The significance level was set at p < 0.05, with extremely significant results defined as p < 0.01.

The results revealed that the effects of A, B, C, AC, BC, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( P < 0.01); the AB response was not significant ( P > 0.05); the linear and quadratic terms of A were significantly higher than those of the other factors.

The protective factors for renal injury exhibit five extremely significant immune cell traits ( P < 0.01), namely central memory CD4 – CD8 – T cell % T cell (OR = 0.007, P = 7.83 × 10 –4 ), CD8 on central memory CD8 + T cell (OR = 0.116, P = 0.003), BAFF-R on IgD – CD38 + B cell (OR = 0.086, P = 0.006), CD4 – CD8 – NK T cell % T cell (OR = 0.068, P = 0.007), and CD25 ++ CD45RA – CD4 + non-regulatory T cell (non-Treg) absolute count (OR = 0.041, P = 0.007).

Results: It was considered that there was a significant difference when the p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference when the p < 0.01 or <0.001 ( 26 ). 2.6.

In terms of plan quality assessment, the total MU for the H group was significantly higher (1066.704 ± 135.183) than that for the T group (772.992 ± 104.023), with extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.01).

In the BF group, daily feed intake showed an extremely significant positive correlation with TAN ( p < 0.01), except for days 21–36.

Two homozygous genotypes of other SNPs presented extremely significant associated with corresponding traits ( p < 0.01).

Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).

The results show that among the test variables used in this study, A (ratio of water to material), B (extraction temperature), and A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant for the extraction rate of EUPS ( p < 0.01).

The results indicate an extremely significant difference in body size between the large and small pig populations in this study ( P < 0.01, P < 0.001).

The different lowercase letters represented significant differences between groups ( P < 0.05), and the different capital letters represented extremely significant differences between groups ( P < 0.01).

T esticular weight and volume, epididymal sperm count and deformity rate, and t esticular mRNA expressions of rat were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p < 0.05 and extremely significant difference p < 0.01.

When comparing the total phenolic content, GL had the highest values of 0.024 ± 0.001%, which was similar to BL 0.022 ± 0.001% ( Figure 2 A); In terms of flavonoid content, GL, RG and BL were 0.390 ± 0.005%, 0.604± 0.006% and 0.096 ± 0.004%, respectively ( Figure 2 B), and the three comparison groups had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01).

The results showed that the mitochondrial membrane potential of the 15% S group was 0.25 ± 0.06 and 0.34 ± 0.05 higher than that of the 20% S group and 5% S group, respectively, with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

“*” and “**” represent significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), respectively.