“extremely significant”

The quantitative analysis of Figure 8D further verified the above results, and the differences in apoptosis rate, number of migrating/invading cells, and protein expression between groups reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.001).

However, it exerted an extremely significant effect on the drip loss rate ( p < 0.001).

The degrees of significance were as follows after the post hoc screening: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

Chi-square test demonstrated an extremely significant difference in mortality between the infected group and control groups ( x 2 = 46.67, p < 0.001).

It was notable that the F IS of the MG breed is 0.376, and it showed an extremely significant difference from the F IS under random rearrangement (p<0.001), indicating that the level of inbreeding in this breed was extremely high.

Differences were considered significant when p≤0.05 (*), very significant when p≤0.01 (**) and extremely significant when p≤0.001 (***).

The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).

And after being put under simulated microgravity for 72 hours, MI shows an extremely significant difference (chi-square test, P <0.001).

Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).

Statistical significance was defined as follows: * p < 0.05, very significant when ** p < 0.01, and extremely significant when *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance.

Results indicated that the number of TP mutations detected by o2n-seq were extremely significant (all P <0.001, Student's t -test) more than that of Cir-seq for any CSs criteria (1 × −5 × ) ( Supplementary Fig. 4a ).

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 < p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

“*” represents significant ( P < 0.05), “**” represents very significant ( P < 0.01), and “***” represents extremely significant ( P < 0.001). 3.

Regarding the treatment, E2-induced reduction in infarct volume was extremely significant in the cortical region ( p < 0.001) and, to a smaller extent, in the subcortical region ( p < 0.05). 2.2.

Differences were considered nonsignificant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) when p < 0.001.

The statistical analysis of mean difference of blue hole diameters from different H 2 O 2 showed that the increase of hole diameters is extremely significant (P<0.001) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 0 to 20 mM, but not significant (P>0.05) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 20 mM to 30 mM ( Table S1 ).

There were extremely significant differences among various age groups in term of aggression and NSSI ( P <0.001).

Level of significance adopted for all tests was p < 0.05 (significant p < 0.05, very significant p < 0.03, extremely significant p < 0.001). 3.

In both Table 5 and Table 6 , the proposed CDOM full-model (integrating channel attention and multi-scale feature fusion) exhibits extremely significant performance gains compared with the other three models (all p < 0.001), which fully verifies the synergistic effect of the two components.

A P < 0.05 was established as statistically significant; significant: 0.01 < P < 0.05; very significant: 0.001 < P < 0.01, and extremely significant: P < 0.001.

The nonobese group showed extremely significant ( P <0.001) increase in GPx activity after 24 and 48 weeks both, while obese group showed significant ( P value<0.05) increase in GPx activity with insulin treatment only after 48 weeks.

Participation R3"Preside over or participate in scientific research projects and patent applications"activities has an extremely significant promoting effect on the improvement of professional abilities ( t = 2.72, p < 0.001).

Both LREEs/HREEs and Eu/Eu* displayed extremely significant and positive correlations with La N /Yb N , La N /Sm N , and Gd N /Yb N ( p < 0.001), respectively.

As shown in Table 2 , school bullying was an extremely significant positive predictor of depression ( β = 0.87, p < 0.001), and the fit index R 2 showed that the predictive model of school bullying on depression explained 6% of its variance.

AUC0-last of normal drug suspension, F3 and F3C was recorded as 5.96, 40.10, and 110.57 ng.h/ml, respectively, whereas AUC 0-inf were recorded as 7.30, 54.57, and 120.05 ng.h/ml, respectively, and both were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) as compared to ELUX suspension.