“extremely significant”

The disparity was not statistically significant in OS ( P > 0.05), while the difference was extremely significant in CSS ( P < 0.001).

The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).

“*” p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically-significant difference, very significant at p < 0.01 and labeled with “**”, and extremely significant at p < 0.001 and labeled with “***”.

Student’s t -tests showed that methylation levels of DMCs in promoter, exon and intron regions were significantly different between CpG islands and CpG island shores ( P < 0.05), while those of intergenic regions were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 5C ).

In fact, among the three populations, extremely significant differences were found for CYP4C67 [ F ( 2 , 27 ) = 21.056, P < 0.001], CYP4C68 [ F ( 2 , 27 ) = 14.979, P < 0.001], CYP4C70 [ F ( 2 , 27 ) = 28.084, P < 0.001], and CYP4DB1 [ F ( 2 , 27 ) = 19.673, P < 0.001].

It was further differentiated between extremely significant (***, p < 0.001), very significant (**, p = 0.001 to 0.01) and significant (*, p = 0.01 to 0.05) results.

Moreover, the three-level AMOVA analysis indicated extremely significant structure between two groups (Φ CT = 0.1298, P < 0.001), with 12.97% genetic variation.

However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).

The differences were considered significant for *P < 0.05, and highly significant for **P < 0.01 and extremely significant for ***P < 0.001 28 .

Forced swim test In this test [ Figure 2 ], after intraperitoneal administration of cilostazol (20 mg/kg) there was extremely significant decrease in immobility time (70.66±2.27; P <0.001) as compared to control (123.33±9.44).

Statistical difference was considered to be significant at a value of P < 0.05 (*), highly significant at a value of P < 0.01 (**) and extremely significant when P < 0.001 (***) or P < 0.0001 (****).

Based on this feature distribution, Figure 5C shows that both current and blue value exhibit extremely significant differences between low‐ and high‐concentration groups ( p < 0.001), validating the rationality of the classification threshold.

Statistical difference was considered to be significant at a value of p <0.05 (*), highly significant at a value of p <0.01 (**) and extremely significant when p <0.001 (***) or p <0.0001 (****).

Values of statistical significance were described through the use of asterisks to denote p -value; not significant: p > 0.05 (ns), significant: p < 0.05 (*), very significant: p < 0.01 (**), extremely significant: p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****). 3.

The ACC of the high-altitude group was higher than that of the low-altitude group, with the difference between the two altitudes being extremely significant as determined by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.001).

The Het difference between the two groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and their distribution intervals were completely nonoverlapping.

KIAA1549::BRAF fusion demonstrated an extremely significant association ( P < 0.001) with biphasic type where it was present in 81% of cases ( Fig. 2 ).

RESULTS Male surgeons had the lowest 2D:4D ratio (0.933 ± 0.01), and this was extremely significant compared with all other groups ( P < 0.001).

As shown in Table 2 , inter-item correlations (construct loadings) were extremely significant in statistics (p < 0.001, all above the threshold value of 0.50 [ 49 ]), which indicated that the latent variables could be strongly explained by measured variables.

For post hoc analysis, we did one tailed t -test, and there were extremely significant differences between ZLE and other methods ( p < 0.001) with respect to MAE as well as correlation coefficient for all input SNR from −5 to 15 dB.

Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Five compounds showed an extremely significant correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) with the turquoise module, four with the brown module, and four with the yellow module (Fig. 3 C).

The factors affecting DPPH antioxidant capacity, chewiness, and drying rate were microwave density >dry point moisture content at conversion point >hot air temperature, among which microwave density had an extremely significant effect on the chewiness ( p < .001) but had a significant effect on drying rate ( p < .05), while the dry point moisture content at conversion point had a significant effect on chewiness and drying rate ( p < .05).

Table 3 shows that parents’ emotional status has extremely significant influences on irritability of the youth ( P< 0.001).

The results show that the interaction term of independent variable and moderating variable has a significant effect on the increase of interpretation rate of model 3 (Δ F =14.989, p <0.001), and regression coefficient of the interaction term of teaching barrier and resilience is extremely significant ( β =−0.342, p <0.001), indicating that the teaching barrier has a very significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between resilience and mental health symptoms (see Table 4 ).