japonensis exhibited an extremely significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation with the following gut microbiota taxa: Epulopiscium , U114 , Bacteroides , Clostridium and Peptostreptococcaceae (0.8< r < 0.9); and a significant ( P < 0.05) correlation with Enterobacteriaceae , Micrococcaceae , Rummeliibacillus , Lysinibacillus boronitolerans , Veillonellaceae , Oxalobacteraceae , Aeromonadaceae (negative), Marinibacillus and Chitinilyticum (0.4< r < 0.7).
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
Statistical significance levels were defined as extremely significant (p < 0.001, ***), very significant (p < 0.01, **), and significant (p < 0.05, *).
From the table, it can be seen that the both second-order models were extremely significant (*P <0.001), the lack-of-fit term were not, anyway.
Tajima’s D value of both GmFT3b and GmFT5b was positive, with their values reaching extremely significant levels ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001), except that the SNPs of GmFT3b exhibited a significant level ( p < 0.01) (Table 1 ).
Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, very significant at p < 0.01, and extremely significant at p < 0.001.
The results showed a high correlation between the two methods in turbulence slope (TS) (P<0.001; r=0.84) and an extremely significant correlation in turbulence onset (TO) (P<0.001; r=0.99).
Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
Values of statistical significance were described through the use of asterisks to denote p -value; not significant: p > 0.05 (ns), significant: p < 0.05 (*), very significant: p < 0.01 (**), extremely significant: p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****). 3.
The results show an extremely significant difference in programming learning approach ( t = 4.268, p < 0.001) and programming learning attitude ( t = 5.618, p < 0.001).
Differences were considered non-significant (ns) for p-values >0.05 (marked as “ns”), significant for p-values <0.05 (marked as *), highly significant for p-values <0.01 (marked as **) and extremely significant for p-values <0.001 (marked as ***), respectively.
Compared to the NK group, the CHMm+RNK group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.001) in C-Caspase-3 and BAX protein levels, with reduced BCL-2 and BCL-XL levels ( p < 0.001).
Statistical validation via perMANOVA indicated extremely significant differences between groups (R 2 = 0.94, p = 0.001).
Even when this distribution is dropped to have 10,000 randomly selected comparisons from each condition, there is still an extremely significant difference of F (1,19,999) = 1,004.58, p < 0.001.
Five compounds showed an extremely significant correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) with the turquoise module, four with the brown module, and four with the yellow module (Fig. 3 C).
However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).
Extremely significant differences (p-value <0.001) of hematological parameters seen among patients with Xmn1 carrier and without the X mn 1 carrier.
It was extremely significant ( p < 0.001) in PD1–PD11 and ( p < 0.01) and was not significant in PD15–PD21 when compared to control.
Statistics GraphPad (version 5) was used to calculate unpaired and paired p values: ***, extremely significant, p < 0.001; **, very significant, p = 0.001-0.01; *, significant, p = 0.01-0.05; and ns , p > 0.05.
The results were interpreted as follows - Insignificant: P > 0.05, Significant: P < 0.05, Highly significant: P < 0.01, Extremely significant: P < 0.001 Observations A total of 33 patients with signs and symptoms of Amlapitta were registered.
The differences between the IFN treatment groups and NC group were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).
Boosting with VLPs resulted in increased antibody titers, with final antibody titers reaching extremely significant (p< 0.001) values over the negative control mice.
A P value of <0.05 was marked as *; a P value of <0.01, which means extremely significant difference, was marked as **; a P value of <0.001, which means extremely significant difference, was marked as ***; and ns means non-significance.
Level of significance adopted for all tests was p < 0.05 (significant p < 0.05, very significant p < 0.03, extremely significant p < 0.001). 3.
The differences were considered significant for *P < 0.05, and highly significant for **P < 0.01 and extremely significant for ***P < 0.001 28 .