Moreover, the three-level AMOVA analysis indicated extremely significant structure between two groups (Φ CT = 0.1298, P < 0.001), with 12.97% genetic variation.
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).
Effect on latency to onset of seizures The latency to seizure onset score revealed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) rise in mice of group III as compared with that of score observed in toxic control that received pilocarpine only.
Besides, our study showed an extremely significant increase (p < 0.001) in SARS-CoV-2 infection from 0.7% in January 2020 to 20% in September 2020 (Table 3 ).
The correlation analysis demonstrated that Proteobacteria , the first dominant phylum, was positively correlated with almost all the environmental factors, among which SBR and GLU had the highest correlation, all of which reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.001); POXC and AK ( p < 0.01); and TOC, UA, and CA ( p < 0.05).
extremely significantqualified
A probability of p < 0.10 was considered as marginally significant, of p < 0.05 as significant, of p < 0.01 as highly significant and of p < 0.001 as extremely significant.
Level of significance adopted for all tests was p < 0.05 (significant p < 0.05, very significant p < 0.03, extremely significant p < 0.001). 3.
Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.001.
In the progressive phase (days 5–7), multiple indicators presented intergroup differences (all p < 0.05), among which age, PLT, AST, and Cr exhibited extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001); the non-survivor group was characterized by older age, elevated AST and Cr, and reduced PLT.
The mean pathological evaluation scores of the rSsCLP5-injected healthy rabbit group and allergic history rabbit group were 2.0 points and 1.83 points, respectively, and there was an extremely significant difference compared with the score of the negative control group ( P < 0.001; Additional file 1 : Table S3).
Triglyceride level was also decreased at 100 and 150 mg/kg doses; which is extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
The results were considered significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).
The statistical value of * P < 0.05 is considered as significant difference; ** P < 0.01 is considered as extremely significant difference; *** P < 0.001 is considered as very significant difference.
Statistical analysis was done using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test or two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (*, 0.01 < p < 0.05), very significant (**, 0.001 < p < 0.01), and extremely significant (***, p < 0.001).
MRT 0-∞ and t 1/2 of WEP-GU decreased and had a very significant difference ( P < 0.01) compared with Control, AUC 0-∞ decreased and had a extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with Control.
Then by a Chi-square test, we found the association between the two partitions was extremely significant (p<0.001), indicating our hypothesis can be confirmed in this way.
Particularly, the Tajima’s D values of BnaFBA1b and BnaFBA8a reached extremely significant levels ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001).
The statistical analysis of independent sample t-tests revealed that compared with the baseline YOLOv5s, all four key metrics of the improved model showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and the large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 4.29–6.82) indicated strong practical significance.
Statistically significant ( p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) features are indicated with ( * ) , (**) , and (***) , respectively.
3.3.3 IL‐6 The model group showed higher expression than that of the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < .001).
Statistical analysis showed that the difference between the size of the capsule formed by the vlp1 Δ mutant or the VLP1 overexpression strains and that of the capsule formed by the wild-type strain was extremely significant ( Figure 2 C, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively, Student’s t -test), indicating that the Vlp1 proteins played an important role in the formation of the cryptococcal capsules.
Differences were considered statistically significant at p <0.05, very significant at p <0.01 and extremely significant at p <0.001.
Compared to the NK group, the CHMm+RNK group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.001) in C-Caspase-3 and BAX protein levels, with reduced BCL-2 and BCL-XL levels ( p < 0.001).
C8α levels in vitreous of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis was around 137 ± 25.86, which was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison to control (1.20 ± 1.20).
Five compounds showed an extremely significant correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) with the turquoise module, four with the brown module, and four with the yellow module (Fig. 3 C).