“extremely significant”

Student’s t -tests showed that methylation levels of DMCs in promoter, exon and intron regions were significantly different between CpG islands and CpG island shores ( P < 0.05), while those of intergenic regions were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 5C ).

The linear term B and quadratic term B 2 had extremely significant effects on the DH ( p < 0.001). 3.4.2.

Differences were considered significant (*) for p < 0.05, highly significant (**) for p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) for p < 0.001.

The difference between the control and the 3 mg/ml dose is statistically extremely significant ( P ≤0.001) ( Fig. 1B ).

Similarly, its improvement relative to CNN-ISA is also extremely significant ( p -value < 0.001).

The frequencies of MNPCEs induced by CP in peripheral blood of mice were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) to that of the normal group [ Table 2 ].

Results were classified as significant (* p < 0.05), very significant (** p < 0.01), and extremely significant (*** p < 0.001). 5.

Statistical analysis showed that the difference was extremely significant, p < 0.001 (Fig. 3b ).

The results show that the interaction term of independent variable and moderating variable has a significant effect on the increase of interpretation rate of model 3 (Δ F =14.989, p <0.001), and regression coefficient of the interaction term of teaching barrier and resilience is extremely significant ( β =−0.342, p <0.001), indicating that the teaching barrier has a very significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between resilience and mental health symptoms (see Table 4 ).

Threat appraisal had an extremely significant positive effect on coping appraisal (0.45, p < 0.001) and SDI (0.27, p < 0.001.

Interestingly, whereas there were no significant differences between the individual effects of BCM and fresh bone chips, there was an additive and in most of the cases extremely significant ( P < 0.001) effect of fresh bone chips combined with BCM-coated DBBM on the osteogenic gene expression at all three time points (dark green bars).

A positive and extremely significant correlation was found between PCT and CRP in all three groups (p < 0.001).

The results demonstrated that there was an extremely significant correlation between the expression levels of DLGAP5, BUB1B, KIF20A, KIF2C, KIF11, FOXM1, and TPX2 and survival time ( p < 0.001), a significant correlation existed between the expression of NDC80, NCAPG, PBK, PRC1, and survival time ( p < 0.01), and a weak correlation between the expression of NUSAP1, ASPM, UBE2C, and survival ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 ).

In the NB population, the DD-DD diplotype showed extremely significant inferiority in BH ( p = 0.001) and HuWI ( p = 6 × 10 −7 ) compared to the other diplotypes.

The difference in WHO grade distribution was extremely significant (p<0.001).

Daytime temperature treatments had extremely significant effects on the duration of all stages, except for adults (egg, df = 2, χ 2 = 45.602, p < 0.001; larvae, df = 2, χ 2 = 96.213, p < 0.001; pupae, df = 2, χ 2 = 112.745, p < 0.001; adult, χ 2 = 14.083; df = 2; p < 0.01; generation time, df = 2, χ 2 = 169.127, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

Decision-making efficiency (number of adjustments) Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the main effect of strategy conditions on the number of adjustments was extremely significant ( F (1, 17) = 185.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.91).

For significance analyses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups was used and * p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant and *** p ≤ 0.001 as extremely significant.

The obese group showed a significant decrease ( P value<0.05) after 24 weeks of insulin therapy and an extremely significant decrease ( P <0.001) in TNF-α and IL-6 levels after 48 weeks of therapy.

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

Compared with the UVA‐exposed control group, the content and relative expression of Nrf2 in the nucleus and cytoplasm of FDOP‐treated HSF cells have extremely significant differences ( p < .001); in addition, the content and relative expression of the Keap1 protein also showed highly significant differences ( p < .001).

In contrast, the group treated with silymarin showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decreases in direct bilirubin, SGOT, SGPT and ALP values toward normalization.

Participation R3"Preside over or participate in scientific research projects and patent applications"activities has an extremely significant promoting effect on the improvement of professional abilities ( t = 2.72, p < 0.001).