“extremely significant”

The improved C max with AUC 0–24 was observed extremely significant (p < 0.001) via i.n. as compared oral and i.v. in the wistar rat’s lungs.

p <0.05 was considered statistically significant (∗), p <0.01 very significant (∗∗), and extremely significant p <0.001 (∗∗∗).

Values were judged extremely significant ( P < 0.001), very significant ( P = 0.001–0.01), significant ( P = 0.01–0.05), or not significant ( P ≥ 0.05).

P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*) if P < 0.05, as very significant (**) if P < 0.01, and as extremely significant (***) if P < 0.001.

The analysis in Note S4, Supporting Information, reveals that different ovarian cancer types exhibit extremely significant differences in τ m ( p < 0.001) of the epithelium (Figure 5c ) and stroma (Figure 5e ).

Daytime temperature treatments had extremely significant effects on the duration of all stages, except for adults (egg, df = 2, χ 2 = 45.602, p < 0.001; larvae, df = 2, χ 2 = 96.213, p < 0.001; pupae, df = 2, χ 2 = 112.745, p < 0.001; adult, χ 2 = 14.083; df = 2; p < 0.01; generation time, df = 2, χ 2 = 169.127, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

Decision-making efficiency (number of adjustments) Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the main effect of strategy conditions on the number of adjustments was extremely significant ( F (1, 17) = 185.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.91).

The results demonstrated that there was an extremely significant correlation between the expression levels of DLGAP5, BUB1B, KIF20A, KIF2C, KIF11, FOXM1, and TPX2 and survival time ( p < 0.001), a significant correlation existed between the expression of NDC80, NCAPG, PBK, PRC1, and survival time ( p < 0.01), and a weak correlation between the expression of NUSAP1, ASPM, UBE2C, and survival ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 ).

Interestingly, whereas there were no significant differences between the individual effects of BCM and fresh bone chips, there was an additive and in most of the cases extremely significant ( P < 0.001) effect of fresh bone chips combined with BCM-coated DBBM on the osteogenic gene expression at all three time points (dark green bars).

However, at both time points, the effect of the test extract at the higher dose (400 mg/kg) was extremely significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that the crude extract had reached its peak antihyperglycemic action at the highest dose.

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

In an LSD significance analysis by using SPSS Statistics, * represents p < 0.05, indicating a significant difference; ** represents p < 0.01, denoting an extremely significant difference; *** represents p < 0.001, suggesting an exceedingly significant statistical difference. 3.

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

Compared with the UVA‐exposed control group, the content and relative expression of Nrf2 in the nucleus and cytoplasm of FDOP‐treated HSF cells have extremely significant differences ( p < .001); in addition, the content and relative expression of the Keap1 protein also showed highly significant differences ( p < .001).

Participation R3"Preside over or participate in scientific research projects and patent applications"activities has an extremely significant promoting effect on the improvement of professional abilities ( t = 2.72, p < 0.001).

For all functional receptors, data on statistically extremely significant hormone specific binding ( p -value ≤ 0.001) were obtained.

In this study, the results showed that IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-a in control group were lower than those of the model control group, and there were extremely significant statistical differences (p < 0.001), indicating that LPS-induced zebrafish pneumonia models elevated inflammatory factors.

purpureus CSU-M183 were extremely significant (p<0.001) compared to that of M . purpureus LQ-6 at 4th day; while the relative expression levels of MpigA , MpigJ , MpigK , cit S , cit C in M . purpureus CSU-M183 were extremely significant (p<0.001) than that of M . purpureus LQ-6 at 7th day.

Additionally, post-hoc results showed that there were extremely significant differences in the pairwise comparisons between the five time points for ABA ( p < 0.001).

The statistical analysis of the cerebral infarction area revealed a significant difference between the RSV10 and MCAO groups ( P = 0.0133), and an extremely significant difference between the RSV20 and MCAO groups ( P < 0.001).

However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

The difference between groups 1 and 3 was extremely significant, and the average of the three groups was 48.16° smaller than that of group 1 ( P < 0.001).